Literature DB >> 26233032

Spatial release from masking in children with bilateral cochlear implants and with normal hearing: Effect of target-interferer similarity.

Sara M Misurelli1, Ruth Y Litovsky1.   

Abstract

In complex auditory environments, it is often difficult to separate a target talker from interfering speech. For normal hearing (NH) adult listeners, similarity between the target and interfering speech leads to increased difficulty in separating them; that is, informational masking occurs due to confusability of the target and interferers. This study investigated performance of children with bilateral cochlear implants (BiCIs) when target and interferers were either same-sex (male) talkers, or different-sex talkers (male target, female interferer). Comparisons between children with BiCIs and NH, when matched for age, were also conducted. Speech intelligibility was measured for target and interferers spatially co-located, or spatially separated with the interferers positioned symmetrically (+90° and -90°) or asymmetrically (both at +90°, right). Spatial release from masking (SRM) was computed as the difference between co-located and separated conditions. Within group BiCI comparisons revealed that in the co-located condition speech intelligibility was worse with the same-sex vs different-sex stimuli. There was also a trend for more SRM with the same-sex vs different-sex stimuli. When comparing BiCI to NH listeners, SRM was larger for the NH groups, suggesting that NH children are better able to make use of spatial cues to improve speech understanding in noise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26233032      PMCID: PMC4506300          DOI: 10.1121/1.4922777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  43 in total

1.  Speech intelligibility and localization in a multi-source environment.

Authors:  M L Hawley; R Y Litovsky; H S Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Individual differences and age effects in a dichotic informational masking paradigm.

Authors:  Frederic L Wightman; Doris J Kistler; Amanda O'Bryan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Spatial speech perception benefits in young children with normal hearing and cochlear implants.

Authors:  Lieselot Van Deun; Astrid van Wieringen; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Release from informational masking in children: effect of multiple signal bursts.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Angela Yarnell Bonino
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A cocktail party model of spatial release from masking by both noise and speech interferers.

Authors:  Gary L Jones; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Aiding and occluding the contralateral ear in implanted children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Christina L Runge; Jamie Jensen; David R Friedland; Ruth Y Litovsky; Sergey Tarima
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Voice gender discrimination provides a measure of more than pitch-related perception in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Tianhao Li; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  Speech recognition by bilateral cochlear implant users in a cocktail-party setting.

Authors:  Philipos C Loizou; Yi Hu; Ruth Litovsky; Gongqiang Yu; Robert Peters; Jennifer Lake; Peter Roland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Speech recognition with varying numbers and types of competing talkers by normal-hearing, cochlear-implant, and implant simulation subjects.

Authors:  Helen E Cullington; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Praat script to detect syllable nuclei and measure speech rate automatically.

Authors:  Nivja H de Jong; Ton Wempe
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-05
View more
  20 in total

1.  Bilateral Cochlear Implants Using Two Electrode Lengths in Infants With Profound Deafness.

Authors:  Camille C Dunn; Elizabeth A Walker; Stephanie Gogel; Tanya Van Voorst; Marlan Hansen; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  The effect of fundamental frequency contour similarity on multi-talker listening in older and younger adults.

Authors:  Peter A Wasiuk; Mathieu Lavandier; Emily Buss; Jacob Oleson; Lauren Calandruccio
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Spatial attention in bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Does Bilateral Experience Lead to Improved Spatial Unmasking of Speech in Children Who Use Bilateral Cochlear Implants?

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Sara M Misurelli
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Binaural release from masking with single- and multi-electrode stimulation in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ann E Todd; Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effect of response context and masker type on word recognition in school-age children and adults.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effect of spatial separation and noise type on sentence recognition by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Yang-Wenyi Liu; Duo-Duo Tao; Ye Jiang; John J GalvinIII; Qian-Jie Fu; Ya-Sheng Yuan; Bing Chen
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 1.494

8.  The Acoustics of Word-Initial Fricatives and Their Effect on Word-Level Intelligibility in Children With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Patrick F Reidy; Kayla Kristensen; Matthew B Winn; Ruth Y Litovsky; Jan R Edwards
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Spatial Release From Masking in Children: Effects of Simulated Unilateral Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Nicole E Corbin; Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  The Effect of Simulated Interaural Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Corey A Stoelb; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.