Literature DB >> 11910126

K-selection, alpha-selection, effectiveness, and tolerance in competition: density-dependent selection revisited.

A Joshi1, N G Prasad, M Shakarad.   

Abstract

In the Drosophila literature, selection for faster development and selection for adapting to high density are often confounded, leading, for example, to the expectation that selection for faster development should also lead to higher competitive ability. At the same time, results from experimental studies on evolution at high density do not agree with many of the predictions from classical density-dependent selection theory. We put together a number of theoretical and empirical results from the literature, and some new experimental results on Drosophila populations successfully subjected to selection for faster development, to argue for a broader interpretation of density-dependent selection. We show that incorporating notions of alpha-selection, and the division of competitive ability into effectiveness and tolerance components, into the concept of density-dependent selection yields a formulation that allows for a better understanding of the empirical results. We also use this broader formulation to predict that selection for faster development in Drosophila should, in fact, lead to the correlated evolution of decreased competitive ability, even though it does lead to the evolution of greater efficiency and higher population growth rates at high density when in monotypic culture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11910126     DOI: 10.1007/bf02728332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet        ISSN: 0022-1333            Impact factor:   1.166


  28 in total

1.  DENSITY-DEPENDENT NATURAL SELECTION IN DROSOPHILA: EVOLUTION OF PUPATION HEIGHT.

Authors:  Laurence D Mueller; Vaughn F Sweet
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  THE SYMMETRY OF CORRELATED SELECTION RESPONSES IN ADAPTIVE EVOLUTION: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY USING DROSOPHILA.

Authors:  Jason Shiotsugu; Armand M Leroi; Hideko Yashiro; Michael R Rose; Laurence D Mueller
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Genetics of larval urea and ammonia tolerance and cross-tolerance in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  D J Borash; M Shimada
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Density-dependent selection incorporating intraspecific competition. II. A diploid model.

Authors:  M A Asmussen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  ARTIFICIAL SELECTION FOR DEVELOPMENTAL TIME IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER IN RELATION TO THE EVOLUTION OF AGING: DIRECT AND CORRELATED RESPONSES.

Authors:  Bas Zwaan; R Bijlsma; R F Hoekstra
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  EQUILIBRIUM ANALYSIS OF SEXUAL SELECTION IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  Gerald S Wilkinson
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  THE RESPONSE TO SELECTION FOR FAST LARVAL DEVELOPMENT IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER AND ITS EFFECT ON ADULT WEIGHT: AN EXAMPLE OF A FITNESS TRADE-OFF.

Authors:  Leonard Nunney
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  DIRECTIONAL AND STABILIZING DENSITY-DEPENDENT NATURAL SELECTION FOR PUPATION HEIGHT IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  Amitabh Joshi; Laurence D Mueller
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  ALTERNATIVE ROUTES TO THE EVOLUTION OF COMPETITIVE ABILITY IN TWO COMPETING SPECIES OF DROSOPHILA.

Authors:  Amitabh Joshi; John N Thompson
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Evolution of competitive ability in Drosophila by density-dependent natural selection.

Authors:  L D Mueller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  15 in total

1.  The evolution of population stability as a by-product of life-history evolution.

Authors:  N G Prasad; Sutirth Dey; Mallikarjun Shakarad; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Adaptation to larval crowding in Drosophila ananassae and Drosophila nasuta nasuta: increased larval competitive ability without increased larval feeding rate.

Authors:  Archana Nagarajan; Sharmila Bharathi Natarajan; Mohan Jayaram; Ananda Thammanna; Sudarshan Chari; Joy Bose; Shreyas V Jois; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  Enhancement of larval immune system traits as a correlated response to selection for rapid development in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Punyatirtha Dey; Kanika Mendiratta; Joy Bose; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.166

4.  Faster development does not lead to correlated evolution of greater pre-adult competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Mallikarjun Shakarad; N G Prasad; Kaustubh Gokhale; Vikram Gadagkar; M Rajamani; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Variation in the relative magnitude of intraspecific and interspecific competitive effects in novel versus familiar environments in two Drosophila species.

Authors:  Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 6.  What have two decades of laboratory life-history evolution studies on Drosophila melanogaster taught us?

Authors:  N G Prasad; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003 Apr-Aug       Impact factor: 1.166

7.  Evolution of increased larval competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster without increased larval feeding rate.

Authors:  Manaswini Sarangi; Archana Nagarajan; Snigdhadip Dey; Joy Bose; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.166

8.  Adaptive landscapes and density-dependent selection in declining salmonid populations: going beyond numerical responses to human disturbance.

Authors:  Sigurd Einum; Grethe Robertsen; Ian A Fleming
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 5.183

9.  Evolution of reproductive isolation as a by-product of divergent life-history evolution in laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Shampa M Ghosh; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Adaptation to larval crowding in Drosophila ananassae leads to the evolution of population stability.

Authors:  Snigdhadip Dey; Joy Bose; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.