Literature DB >> 28565147

ARTIFICIAL SELECTION FOR DEVELOPMENTAL TIME IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER IN RELATION TO THE EVOLUTION OF AGING: DIRECT AND CORRELATED RESPONSES.

Bas Zwaan1, R Bijlsma1, R F Hoekstra2.   

Abstract

A wild-type strain of Drosophila melanogaster was successfully selected for both fast and slow larval development. The realized heritabilities (h2 ) ranged from 0.20 to 0.30 for the fast lines and 0.35 to 0.60 for the slow lines. The selection applied is relevant in relation to the evolution of aging. The longevity of adults, either virgin or mated, was not affected by selection for developmental time, indicating that developmental time is not a causal determinant of life span, thus confirming the results of the studies on environmental effects on aging (Zwaan et al. 1991, 1992). However, adult body weights were higher in the slow developmental lines and lower in the fast lines, relative to the control flies. Furthermore, slow females showed relatively high early fecundity and low late fecundity, as compared with control and fast females. Mated longevities and total lifetime progeny productions were not statistically different. Previous results obtained by other authors from selection experiments on age at reproduction either supported the mutation accumulation or the negative pleiotropy theory of aging (Luckinbill et al. 1984; Rose 1984b). The impact of the reported results on the interpretation of these studies is discussed, and it is noted that direct selection on adult longevity is needed to settle this issue. © 1995 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging theory; Drosophila; body weight; developmental time; reproduction; selection

Year:  1995        PMID: 28565147     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb02300.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  18 in total

1.  K-selection, alpha-selection, effectiveness, and tolerance in competition: density-dependent selection revisited.

Authors:  A Joshi; N G Prasad; M Shakarad
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.166

2.  Sexual conflict and environmental change: trade-offs within and between the sexes during the evolution of desiccation resistance.

Authors:  Lucia Kwan; Stéphanie Bedhomme; N G Prasad; Adam K Chippindale
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  Effects of body-size variation on flight-related traits in latitudinal populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Veer Bhan; Ravi Parkash; Dau Dayal Aggarwal
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.166

4.  Gender based disruptive selection maintains body size polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Jaya Handa; K T Chandrashekara; Khushboo Kashyap; Geetanjali Sageena; Mallikarjun N Shakarad
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Genetic correlation between the pre-adult developmental period and locomotor activity rhythm in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  K H Takahashi; K Teramura; S Muraoka; Y Okada; T Miyatake
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  The devil in the details of life-history evolution: instability and reversal of genetic correlations during selection on Drosophila development.

Authors:  Adam K Chippindale; Anh L Ngo; Michael R Rose
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 7.  What have two decades of laboratory life-history evolution studies on Drosophila melanogaster taught us?

Authors:  N G Prasad; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003 Apr-Aug       Impact factor: 1.166

8.  Correlated changes in circadian clocks in response to selection for faster pre-adult development in fruit flies Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Pankaj Yadav; Vijay Kumar Sharma
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 2.200

9.  Experimental evolution of aging, growth, and reproduction in fruitflies.

Authors:  S C Stearns; M Ackermann; M Doebeli; M Kaiser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Life-History Evolution and the Genetics of Fitness Components in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Thomas Flatt
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.