Literature DB >> 28568802

THE SYMMETRY OF CORRELATED SELECTION RESPONSES IN ADAPTIVE EVOLUTION: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY USING DROSOPHILA.

Jason Shiotsugu1, Armand M Leroi1, Hideko Yashiro1, Michael R Rose1, Laurence D Mueller1.   

Abstract

The relationship between the processes of density-dependent and age-specific selection has been investigated by examining a common phenotype, urea resistance, which has apparently evolved in response to each of these selection mechanisms. Twenty populations that have experienced differing levels of age-specific selection show differences in egg-to-adult viability in environments with high levels of urea. Among this group of populations, it appears that resistance to urea is correlated with longevity, but not development time. Ten populations kept at extreme larval densities for many generations also show responses to urea: those kept at high larval densities appear to be most resistant to urea. However, these populations show no differences in adult longevity. An additional five populations were selected directly for urea resistance by adding this compound to the larval food environment. Again, there was a strong response to this artificial selection, with urea resistance increasing dramatically, but these populations showed no response in adult longevity or resistance to crowding when compared to five control populations. There is clearly no simple relationship between longevity and larval urea resistance. It may be that age-specific and density-dependent selection induce similar changes in this phenotype, but do so through different genetic and physiological pathways. We suggest that these data are not consistent with the view of constant and symmetric genetic variance-covariance matrices. These data support a more prominent role for observations of evolutionary trajectories rather than static measurements of genetic components of variance. © 1997 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Correlated responses; Drosophila; development; evolution; life history; senescence; stress resistance; urea

Year:  1997        PMID: 28568802     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb02397.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  9 in total

1.  K-selection, alpha-selection, effectiveness, and tolerance in competition: density-dependent selection revisited.

Authors:  A Joshi; N G Prasad; M Shakarad
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.166

2.  Indirect genetic effects and the lek paradox: inter-genotypic competition may strengthen genotype x environment interactions and conserve genetic variance.

Authors:  Anne M Danielson-François; Yihong Zhou; Michael D Greenfield
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Adaptation to larval crowding in Drosophila ananassae and Drosophila nasuta nasuta: increased larval competitive ability without increased larval feeding rate.

Authors:  Archana Nagarajan; Sharmila Bharathi Natarajan; Mohan Jayaram; Ananda Thammanna; Sudarshan Chari; Joy Bose; Shreyas V Jois; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.166

4.  A model of the evolution of larval feeding rate in Drosophila driven by conflicting energy demands.

Authors:  Laurence D Mueller; Thomas T Barter
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  Environmentally induced changes in correlated responses to selection reveal variable pleiotropy across a complex genetic network.

Authors:  Kristin L Sikkink; Rose M Reynolds; William A Cresko; Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 6.  What have two decades of laboratory life-history evolution studies on Drosophila melanogaster taught us?

Authors:  N G Prasad; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003 Apr-Aug       Impact factor: 1.166

7.  Evolution of increased larval competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster without increased larval feeding rate.

Authors:  Manaswini Sarangi; Archana Nagarajan; Snigdhadip Dey; Joy Bose; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.166

8.  Effects of larval crowding on quantitative variation for development time and viability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Barbara Horváth; Alex T Kalinka
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 9.  Life-History Evolution and the Genetics of Fitness Components in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Thomas Flatt
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.562

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.