Literature DB >> 28565141

ALTERNATIVE ROUTES TO THE EVOLUTION OF COMPETITIVE ABILITY IN TWO COMPETING SPECIES OF DROSOPHILA.

Amitabh Joshi1, John N Thompson2.   

Abstract

The evolution of components of interspecific competitive ability was examined in three different environments for three replicate pairs of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans populations. Populations evolved enhanced competitive ability in three ways: (1) increased effectiveness at reducing the numbers of the competitor species; (2) increased resistance to the inhibitory effects of the competitor species; or (3) a combination of the two. Considerable variation was seen in the evolutionary outcomes of competition among environments, and also among replicate populations within environments. Significant replicate-by-environment interactions were also observed. The results suggest that the evolutionary routes to the evolution of enhanced competitive abilities can potentially differ among subdivided populations, creating a geographic mosaic of outcomes. © 1995 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Competitive ability; Drosophila; geographic structure; variable outcomes

Year:  1995        PMID: 28565141     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb02298.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  11 in total

1.  K-selection, alpha-selection, effectiveness, and tolerance in competition: density-dependent selection revisited.

Authors:  A Joshi; N G Prasad; M Shakarad
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.166

2.  Adaptation to larval crowding in Drosophila ananassae and Drosophila nasuta nasuta: increased larval competitive ability without increased larval feeding rate.

Authors:  Archana Nagarajan; Sharmila Bharathi Natarajan; Mohan Jayaram; Ananda Thammanna; Sudarshan Chari; Joy Bose; Shreyas V Jois; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  Evolution of an inferior competitor increases resistance to biological invasion.

Authors:  Rachel M Germain; Diane Srivastava; Amy L Angert
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 15.460

4.  Variation in the relative magnitude of intraspecific and interspecific competitive effects in novel versus familiar environments in two Drosophila species.

Authors:  Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.166

5.  Competitive history shapes rapid evolution in a seasonal climate.

Authors:  Tess Nahanni Grainger; Seth M Rudman; Paul Schmidt; Jonathan M Levine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Coexistence of three different Drosophila species by rescheduling their life history traits in a natural population.

Authors:  Jay P Yadav; Bashisth N Singh
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.166

7.  Interpopulation divergence in competitive interactions of the mosquito Aedes albopictus.

Authors:  P T Leisnham; L P Lounibos; G F O'Meara; S A Juliano
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.499

8.  The contribution of ancestry, chance, and past and ongoing selection to adaptive evolution.

Authors:  Amitabh Joshi; Robinson B Castillo; Laurence D Mueller
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 9.  What have two decades of laboratory life-history evolution studies on Drosophila melanogaster taught us?

Authors:  N G Prasad; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003 Apr-Aug       Impact factor: 1.166

10.  Interspecific Competition between Aedes albopictus and A. sierrensis: potential for Competitive Displacement in the Western United States.

Authors:  Banugopan Kesavaraju; Paul T Leisnham; Samantha Keane; Nicholas Delisi; Rachel Pozatti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.