Literature DB >> 28568099

DIRECTIONAL AND STABILIZING DENSITY-DEPENDENT NATURAL SELECTION FOR PUPATION HEIGHT IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Amitabh Joshi1, Laurence D Mueller2.   

Abstract

Six populations of Drosophila melanogaster have been kept at extreme population densities, three high and three low, for 175 generations. Larvae from the high density populations pupate 50%-100% higher than larvae from the low density populations. At high larval test densities there is both a directional and a stabilizing component to selection, with viabilities ranging from 0.14 to 0.992, depending on the choice of pupation site. The directional component is stronger on the populations which have evolved at low densities, while the stabilizing component is stronger on the populations which have evolved at high densities. There is no indication that the evolution of this trait, in response to density, has altered its phenotypic plasticity. © 1993 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavior; Drosophila melanogaster; K-selection; density-dependent natural selection; pupation height; r-selection; stabilizing selection

Year:  1993        PMID: 28568099     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb01208.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  13 in total

1.  K-selection, alpha-selection, effectiveness, and tolerance in competition: density-dependent selection revisited.

Authors:  A Joshi; N G Prasad; M Shakarad
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.166

2.  Adaptation to larval crowding in Drosophila ananassae and Drosophila nasuta nasuta: increased larval competitive ability without increased larval feeding rate.

Authors:  Archana Nagarajan; Sharmila Bharathi Natarajan; Mohan Jayaram; Ananda Thammanna; Sudarshan Chari; Joy Bose; Shreyas V Jois; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  Temperature and parasitism by Asobara tabida (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) influence larval pupation behaviour in two Drosophila species.

Authors:  Céline Josso; Joffrey Moiroux; Philippe Vernon; Joan van Baaren; Jacques J M van Alphen
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2011-06-17

4.  Motor dysfunction in Drosophila melanogaster as a biomarker for developmental neurotoxicity.

Authors:  Ana Cabrita; Alexandra M Medeiros; Telmo Pereira; António Sebastião Rodrigues; Michel Kranendonk; César S Mendes
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-06-07

5.  Circadian clocks and life-history related traits: is pupation height affected by circadian organization in Drosophila melanogaster?

Authors:  Dhanashree A Paranjpe; D Anitha; Vijay Kumar Sharma; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.166

6.  The contribution of ancestry, chance, and past and ongoing selection to adaptive evolution.

Authors:  Amitabh Joshi; Robinson B Castillo; Laurence D Mueller
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 7.  What have two decades of laboratory life-history evolution studies on Drosophila melanogaster taught us?

Authors:  N G Prasad; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003 Apr-Aug       Impact factor: 1.166

8.  Evolution of increased larval competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster without increased larval feeding rate.

Authors:  Manaswini Sarangi; Archana Nagarajan; Snigdhadip Dey; Joy Bose; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.166

9.  Differential tolerance to direct and indirect density-dependent costs of viral infection in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Israel Pagán; Carlos Alonso-Blanco; Fernando García-Arenal
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 6.823

10.  Ancestral ecological regime shapes reaction to food limitation in the Least Killifish, Heterandria   formosa.

Authors:  Anja Felmy; Jeff Leips; Joseph Travis
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.