Literature DB >> 28565282

THE RESPONSE TO SELECTION FOR FAST LARVAL DEVELOPMENT IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER AND ITS EFFECT ON ADULT WEIGHT: AN EXAMPLE OF A FITNESS TRADE-OFF.

Leonard Nunney1.   

Abstract

A selection experiment using Drosophila melanogaster revealed a strong trade-off between adult weight and larval development time (LDT), supporting the view that antagonistic pleiotropy for these two fitness traits determines mean adult size. Two experimental lines of flies were selected for a shorter LDT (measured from egg laying to pupation). After 15 generations LDT was reduced by an average of 7.9%. The response appeared to be controlled primarily by autosomal loci. A correlated response to the selection was a reduction in adult dry weight: individuals from the selected populations were on average 15.1% lighter than the controls. The lighter females of the selected lines showed a 35% drop in fecundity, but no change in longevity. Thus, there is no direct relationship between LDT and adult longevity. The genetic correlation between weight and LDT, as measured from their joint response to selection, was 0.86. Although there was weak evidence for dominance in LDT, there was none for weight, making it unlikely that selection acting on this antagonistic pleiotropy could lead to a stable polymorphism. In all lines, sex differences in weight violated expectations based on intrasex genetic correlations: Females, being larger than males, ought to require a longer LDT, whereas there was a slight trend in the opposite direction. Because the sexual dimorphism in size was not significantly altered by selection, it appears that the controlling loci are either invariant or have very limited pleiotropic effect on developmental time. It is suggested that they probably control some intrinsic, energy-intensive developmental process in males. © 1996 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body size; development time; fecundity; fitness trade-off; genetic correlation; life-history evolution; longevity; selection

Year:  1996        PMID: 28565282     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb02360.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  22 in total

1.  K-selection, alpha-selection, effectiveness, and tolerance in competition: density-dependent selection revisited.

Authors:  A Joshi; N G Prasad; M Shakarad
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.166

2.  Sexual conflict and environmental change: trade-offs within and between the sexes during the evolution of desiccation resistance.

Authors:  Lucia Kwan; Stéphanie Bedhomme; N G Prasad; Adam K Chippindale
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  Effects of body-size variation on flight-related traits in latitudinal populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Veer Bhan; Ravi Parkash; Dau Dayal Aggarwal
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.166

4.  Enhancement of larval immune system traits as a correlated response to selection for rapid development in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Punyatirtha Dey; Kanika Mendiratta; Joy Bose; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.166

5.  Gender based disruptive selection maintains body size polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Jaya Handa; K T Chandrashekara; Khushboo Kashyap; Geetanjali Sageena; Mallikarjun N Shakarad
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Stage-specific effects of candidate heterochronic genes on variation in developmental time along an altitudinal cline of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Julián Mensch; Valeria Carreira; Nicolás Lavagnino; Julieta Goenaga; Guillermo Folguera; Esteban Hasson; Juan José Fanara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Latitudinal clines in Drosophila melanogaster: body size, allozyme frequencies, inversion frequencies, and the insulin-signalling pathway.

Authors:  Gerdien De Jong; Zoltán Bochdanovits
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.166

8.  The devil in the details of life-history evolution: instability and reversal of genetic correlations during selection on Drosophila development.

Authors:  Adam K Chippindale; Anh L Ngo; Michael R Rose
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 9.  What have two decades of laboratory life-history evolution studies on Drosophila melanogaster taught us?

Authors:  N G Prasad; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003 Apr-Aug       Impact factor: 1.166

10.  Correlated changes in circadian clocks in response to selection for faster pre-adult development in fruit flies Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Pankaj Yadav; Vijay Kumar Sharma
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 2.200

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.