Literature DB >> 3132712

Evolution of competitive ability in Drosophila by density-dependent natural selection.

L D Mueller1.   

Abstract

The theory of density-dependent natural selection predicts that populations kept at extreme densities should evolve different competitive abilities for limited resources. These predictions have been tested with laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Six independent populations were maintained in two environments, called r and K, for 128 generations. In the r environment, population sizes were small and resources for larvae and adults were abundant. In contrast the populations in the K environment were large and crowded, and resources, such as food and space, were in short supply. The relative competitive ability for food has been estimated for each population. Populations from the K environment consume food at a rate that is 58% greater than the average rate for the r population. The differentiation of competitive abilities in these populations is due to natural selection and is consistent with predictions from the theory of evolutionary ecology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3132712      PMCID: PMC280433          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.85.12.4383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  5 in total

1.  r and K Selection in Experimental Populations of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  L S Luckinbill
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-12-15       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Life-history tactics: a review of the ideas.

Authors:  S C Stearns
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 4.875

3.  Density-dependent selection incorporating intraspecific competition. II. A diploid model.

Authors:  M A Asmussen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Trade-off between r-selection and K-selection in Drosophila populations.

Authors:  L D Mueller; F J Ayala
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Evolution of accelerated senescence in laboratory populations of Drosophila.

Authors:  L D Mueller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 11.205

  5 in total
  18 in total

1.  K-selection, alpha-selection, effectiveness, and tolerance in competition: density-dependent selection revisited.

Authors:  A Joshi; N G Prasad; M Shakarad
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.166

2.  Evolution of foraging behavior in Drosophila by density-dependent selection.

Authors:  M B Sokolowski; H S Pereira; K Hughes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-07-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Adaptation to larval crowding in Drosophila ananassae and Drosophila nasuta nasuta: increased larval competitive ability without increased larval feeding rate.

Authors:  Archana Nagarajan; Sharmila Bharathi Natarajan; Mohan Jayaram; Ananda Thammanna; Sudarshan Chari; Joy Bose; Shreyas V Jois; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.166

4.  Evolution of behavior by density-dependent natural selection.

Authors:  P Z Guo; L D Mueller; F J Ayala
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The capture of heritable variation for genetic quality through social competition.

Authors:  Jason B Wolf; W Edwin Harris; Nick J Royle
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. IV. Targets of selection and the specificity of adaptation.

Authors:  M Travisano; R E Lenski
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  A demographic approach to selection.

Authors:  W W Anderson; T K Watanabe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-07-22       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A model of the evolution of larval feeding rate in Drosophila driven by conflicting energy demands.

Authors:  Laurence D Mueller; Thomas T Barter
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 1.082

9.  Effect of density on magnitude of directional selection on seed mass and emergence time in Plantago wrightiana Dcne. (Plantaginaceae).

Authors:  A A Winn; T E Miller
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 10.  What have two decades of laboratory life-history evolution studies on Drosophila melanogaster taught us?

Authors:  N G Prasad; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003 Apr-Aug       Impact factor: 1.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.