Literature DB >> 27350686

Adaptation to larval crowding in Drosophila ananassae and Drosophila nasuta nasuta: increased larval competitive ability without increased larval feeding rate.

Archana Nagarajan1, Sharmila Bharathi Natarajan, Mohan Jayaram, Ananda Thammanna, Sudarshan Chari, Joy Bose, Shreyas V Jois, Amitabh Joshi.   

Abstract

The standard view of adaptation to larval crowding in fruitflies, built on results from 25 years of multiple experimental evolution studies on Drosophila melanogaster, was that enhanced competitive ability evolves primarily through increased larval feeding and foraging rate, and increased larval tolerance to nitrogenous wastes, at the cost of efficiency of food conversion to biomass. These results were at odds from the predictions of classical K-selection theory, notably the expectation that selection at high density should result in the increase of efficiency of conversion of food to biomass, and were better interpreted through the lens of α-selection. We show here that populations of D. ananassae and D. n. nasuta subjected to extreme larval crowding evolve greater competitive ability and pre-adult survivorship at high density, primarily through a combination of reduced larval duration, faster attainment of minimum critical size for pupation, greater time efficiency of food conversion to biomass and increased pupation height, with a relatively small role of increased urea/ammonia tolerance, if at all. This is a very different suite of traits than that seen to evolve under similar selection in D. melanogaster, and seems to be closer to the expectations from the canonical theory of K-selection. We also discuss possible reasons for these differences in results across the three species. Overall, the results reinforce the view that our understanding of the evolution of competitive ability in fruitflies needs to be more nuanced than before, with an appreciation that there may be multiple evolutionary routes through which higher competitive ability can be attained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27350686     DOI: 10.1007/s12041-016-0655-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet        ISSN: 0022-1333            Impact factor:   1.166


  26 in total

1.  Evolution of behavior by density-dependent natural selection.

Authors:  P Z Guo; L D Mueller; F J Ayala
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Trade-off associated with selection for increased ability to resist parasitoid attack in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M D Fellowes; A R Kraaijeveld; H C Godfray
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  DENSITY-DEPENDENT NATURAL SELECTION IN DROSOPHILA: EVOLUTION OF PUPATION HEIGHT.

Authors:  Laurence D Mueller; Vaughn F Sweet
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  THE SYMMETRY OF CORRELATED SELECTION RESPONSES IN ADAPTIVE EVOLUTION: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY USING DROSOPHILA.

Authors:  Jason Shiotsugu; Armand M Leroi; Hideko Yashiro; Michael R Rose; Laurence D Mueller
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  DENSITY-DEPENDENT EVOLUTION OF LIFE-HISTORY TRAITS IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  Todd J Bierbaum; Laurence D Mueller; Francisco J Ayala
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  ALTERNATIVE ROUTES TO THE EVOLUTION OF COMPETITIVE ABILITY IN TWO COMPETING SPECIES OF DROSOPHILA.

Authors:  Amitabh Joshi; John N Thompson
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  ASSOCIATION BETWEEN FEEDING RATE AND PARASITOID RESISTANCE IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  M D E Fellowes; A R Kraaijeveld; H C J Godfray
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  The contribution of ancestry, chance, and past and ongoing selection to adaptive evolution.

Authors:  Amitabh Joshi; Robinson B Castillo; Laurence D Mueller
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.166

9.  Evolution of competitive ability in Drosophila by density-dependent natural selection.

Authors:  L D Mueller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  What have two decades of laboratory life-history evolution studies on Drosophila melanogaster taught us?

Authors:  N G Prasad; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003 Apr-Aug       Impact factor: 1.166

View more
  6 in total

1.  Niche construction in evolutionary theory: the construction of an academic niche?

Authors:  Manan Gupta; N G Prasad; Sutirth Dey; Amitabh Joshi; N C Vidya T
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.166

2.  Evolution of increased larval competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster without increased larval feeding rate.

Authors:  Manaswini Sarangi; Archana Nagarajan; Snigdhadip Dey; Joy Bose; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  Invasion and Spreading of Drosophila nasuta (Diptera, Drosophilidae) in the Caatinga Biome, Brazil.

Authors:  Martín Alejandro Montes; Carlos Henrique Campos Bezerra Neves; Alan Felipe Ferreira; Maria de Fátima Severina Dos Santos; Júlia Isabelle Freire Peres Quintas; Gabriely Dias Ângelo Manetta; Paulo Victor de Oliveira; Ana Cristina Lauer Garcia
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 1.650

4.  Evolution of pathogen-specific improved survivorship post-infection in populations of Drosophila melanogaster adapted to larval crowding.

Authors:  Rohit Kapila; Mayank Kashyap; Soumyadip Poddar; Shreya Gangwal; N G G Prasad
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Investment in adult reproductive tissues is affected by larval growth conditions but not by evolution under poor larval growth conditions in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Rohit Kapila; Soumyadip Poddar; Neeraj Meena; Nagaraj Guru Prasad
Journal:  Curr Res Insect Sci       Date:  2021-12-15

6.  The effects of adaptation to urea on feeding rates and growth in Drosophila larvae.

Authors:  Kathreen Bitner; Grant A Rutledge; James N Kezos; Laurence D Mueller
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 2.912

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.