Literature DB >> 26269555

Spike timing precision changes with spike rate adaptation in the owl's auditory space map.

Clifford H Keller1, Terry T Takahashi2.   

Abstract

Spike rate adaptation (SRA) is a continuing change of responsiveness to ongoing stimuli, which is ubiquitous across species and levels of sensory systems. Under SRA, auditory responses to constant stimuli change over time, relaxing toward a long-term rate often over multiple timescales. With more variable stimuli, SRA causes the dependence of spike rate on sound pressure level to shift toward the mean level of recent stimulus history. A model based on subtractive adaptation (Benda J, Hennig RM. J Comput Neurosci 24: 113-136, 2008) shows that changes in spike rate and level dependence are mechanistically linked. Space-specific neurons in the barn owl's midbrain, when recorded under ketamine-diazepam anesthesia, showed these classical characteristics of SRA, while at the same time exhibiting changes in spike timing precision. Abrupt level increases of sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) noise initially led to spiking at higher rates with lower temporal precision. Spike rate and precision relaxed toward their long-term values with a time course similar to SRA, results that were also replicated by the subtractive model. Stimuli whose amplitude modulations (AMs) were not synchronous across carrier frequency evoked spikes in response to stimulus envelopes of a particular shape, characterized by the spectrotemporal receptive field (STRF). Again, abrupt stimulus level changes initially disrupted the temporal precision of spiking, which then relaxed along with SRA. We suggest that shifts in latency associated with stimulus level changes may differ between carrier frequency bands and underlie decreased spike precision. Thus SRA is manifest not simply as a change in spike rate but also as a change in the temporal precision of spiking.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amplitude modulation; inferior colliculus; spectrotemporal receptive field

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26269555      PMCID: PMC4600961          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00442.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  74 in total

1.  Spike-timing precision underlies the coding efficiency of auditory receptor neurons.

Authors:  Ariel Rokem; Sebastian Watzl; Tim Gollisch; Martin Stemmler; Andreas V M Herz; Inés Samengo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Estimating receptive fields in the presence of spike-time jitter.

Authors:  Tim Gollisch
Journal:  Network       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.273

3.  Effects of stimulus transformations on estimates of sensory neuron selectivity.

Authors:  Alexander G Dimitrov; Tomás Gedeon
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 1.621

4.  Responses to amplitude-modulated tones in the auditory nerve of the cat.

Authors:  P X Joris; T C Yin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Synaptic depression and cortical gain control.

Authors:  L F Abbott; J A Varela; K Sen; S B Nelson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-01-10       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The neural code between neocortical pyramidal neurons depends on neurotransmitter release probability.

Authors:  M V Tsodyks; H Markram
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Reliability of spike timing in neocortical neurons.

Authors:  Z F Mainen; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-06-09       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Cochlear nerve fiber responses to amplitude-modulated stimuli: variations with spontaneous rate and other response characteristics.

Authors:  N P Cooper; D Robertson; G K Yates
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Encoding of amplitude modulation in the cochlear nucleus of the cat.

Authors:  W S Rhode; S Greenberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  2 in total

1.  Modulation of neuronal dynamic range using two different adaptation mechanisms.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Ye Wang; Wen-Long Fu; Li-Hong Cao
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 5.135

2.  Is Neuromorphic MNIST Neuromorphic? Analyzing the Discriminative Power of Neuromorphic Datasets in the Time Domain.

Authors:  Laxmi R Iyer; Yansong Chua; Haizhou Li
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 4.677

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.