Literature DB >> 23554438

Linear summation in the barn owl's brainstem underlies responses to interaural time differences.

Paula T Kuokkanen1, Go Ashida, Catherine E Carr, Hermann Wagner, Richard Kempter.   

Abstract

The neurophonic potential is a synchronized frequency-following extracellular field potential that can be recorded in the nucleus laminaris (NL) in the brainstem of the barn owl. Putative generators of the neurophonic are the afferent axons from the nucleus magnocellularis, synapses onto NL neurons, and spikes of NL neurons. The outputs of NL, i.e., action potentials of NL neurons, are only weakly represented in the neurophonic. Instead, the inputs to NL, i.e., afferent axons and their synaptic potentials, are the predominant origin of the neurophonic (Kuokkanen PT, Wagner H, Ashida G, Carr CE, Kempter R. J Neurophysiol 104: 2274-2290, 2010). Thus in NL the monaural inputs from the two brain sides converge and create a binaural neurophonic. If these monaural inputs contribute independently to the extracellular field, the response to binaural stimulation can be predicted from the sum of the responses to ipsi- and contralateral stimulation. We found that a linear summation model explains the dependence of the responses on interaural time difference as measured experimentally with binaural stimulation. The fit between model predictions and data was excellent, even without taking into account the nonlinear responses of NL coincidence detector neurons, although their firing rate and synchrony strongly depend on the interaural time difference. These results are consistent with the view that the afferent axons and their synaptic potentials in NL are the primary origin of the neurophonic.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory coincidence detector; extracellular field potential; neurophonic; phase locking; sound localization

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23554438      PMCID: PMC3727037          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00410.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  50 in total

1.  Microelectrode study of superior olivary nuclei.

Authors:  R GALAMBOS; J SCHWARTZKOPFF; A RUPERT
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1959-09

2.  Microsecond precision of phase delay in the auditory system of the barn owl.

Authors:  Hermann Wagner; Sandra Brill; Richard Kempter; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Passive soma facilitates submillisecond coincidence detection in the owl's auditory system.

Authors:  Go Ashida; Kousuke Abe; Kazuo Funabiki; Masakazu Konishi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Sound-intensity-dependent compensation for the small interaural time difference cue for sound source localization.

Authors:  Eri Nishino; Rei Yamada; Hiroshi Kuba; Hiroyuki Hioki; Takahiro Furuta; Takeshi Kaneko; Harunori Ohmori
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Tuning to interaural time difference and frequency differs between the auditory arcopallium and the external nucleus of the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Katrin Vonderschen; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Extracting oscillations. Neuronal coincidence detection with noisy periodic spike input.

Authors:  R Kempter; W Gerstner; J L van Hemmen; H Wagner
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 2.026

7.  Tolerance to sound intensity of binaural coincidence detection in the nucleus laminaris of the owl.

Authors:  J L Peña; S Viete; Y Albeck; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  A circuit for detection of interaural time differences in the brain stem of the barn owl.

Authors:  C E Carr; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Neural map of interaural phase difference in the owl's brainstem.

Authors:  W E Sullivan; M Konishi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Low-frequency envelope sensitivity produces asymmetric binaural tuning curves.

Authors:  John P Agapiou; David McAlpine
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  10 in total

1.  Maps of interaural delay in the owl's nucleus laminaris.

Authors:  Catherine E Carr; Sahil Shah; Thomas McColgan; Go Ashida; Paula T Kuokkanen; Sandra Brill; Richard Kempter; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Microsecond-scale timing precision in rodent trigeminal primary afferents.

Authors:  Michael R Bale; Dario Campagner; Andrew Erskine; Rasmus S Petersen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Neural Maps of Interaural Time Difference in the American Alligator: A Stable Feature in Modern Archosaurs.

Authors:  Lutz Kettler; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  A functional circuit model of interaural time difference processing.

Authors:  Thomas McColgan; Sahil Shah; Christine Köppl; Catherine Carr; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Neural Correlates of the Binaural Masking Level Difference in Human Frequency-Following Responses.

Authors:  Christopher G Clinard; Sarah L Hodgson; Mary Ellen Scherer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-28

6.  Contribution of action potentials to the extracellular field potential in the nucleus laminaris of barn owl.

Authors:  Paula T Kuokkanen; Go Ashida; Anna Kraemer; Thomas McColgan; Kazuo Funabiki; Hermann Wagner; Christine Köppl; Catherine E Carr; Richard Kempter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The Binaural Interaction Component in Barn Owl (Tyto alba) Presents few Differences to Mammalian Data.

Authors:  Nicolas Palanca-Castan; Geneviève Laumen; Darrin Reed; Christine Köppl
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-25

8.  A model of the medial superior olive explains spatiotemporal features of local field potentials.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Myles Mc Laughlin; Eric Verschooten; Philip X Joris; John Rinzel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Spatial cue reliability drives frequency tuning in the barn Owl's midbrain.

Authors:  Fanny Cazettes; Brian J Fischer; Jose L Pena
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Dipolar extracellular potentials generated by axonal projections.

Authors:  Thomas McColgan; Ji Liu; Paula Tuulia Kuokkanen; Catherine Emily Carr; Hermann Wagner; Richard Kempter
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 8.140

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.