Literature DB >> 19571193

Auditory spatial tuning at the crossroads of the midbrain and forebrain.

M Lucía Pérez1, Sharad J Shanbhag, José Luis Peña.   

Abstract

The barn owl's midbrain and forebrain contain neurons tuned to sound direction. The spatial receptive fields of these neurons result from sensitivity to combinations of interaural time (ITD) and level (ILD) differences over a broad frequency range. While a map of auditory space has been described in the midbrain, no similar topographic representation has been found in the forebrain. The first nuclei that belong exclusively to the forebrain and midbrain pathways are the thalamic nucleus ovoidalis (Ov) and the external nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICx), respectively. The midbrain projects to the auditory thalamus before sharp spatial receptive fields emerge; although Ov and ICx receive projections from the same midbrain nuclei, they are not directly connected. We compared the spatial tuning in Ov and ICx. Thalamic neurons respond to a broader frequency range and their ITD and ILD tuning varied more across frequency. However, neurons in Ov showed spatial receptive fields as selective as neurons in ICx. Thalamic spatial receptive fields were tuned to frontal and contralateral space and correlated with their tuning to ITD and ILD. Our results indicate that spatial tuning emerges in both pathways by similar combination selectivity to ITD and ILD. However, the midbrain and the thalamus do not appear to repeat exactly the same processing, as indicated by the difference in frequency range and the broader tuning to binaural cues. The differences observed at the initial stages of these sound-localization pathways may reflect diverse functions and coding schemes of midbrain and forebrain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19571193      PMCID: PMC2746782          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00400.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  62 in total

1.  Neural bases of an auditory illusion and its elimination in owls.

Authors:  K Saberi; Y Takahashi; H Farahbod; M Konishi
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 2.  Maps versus clusters: different representations of auditory space in the midbrain and forebrain.

Authors:  Y E Cohen; E I Knudsen
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  Distribution within the barn owl's inferior colliculus of neurons projecting to the optic tectum and thalamus.

Authors:  Ben J Arthur
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 3.215

4.  Comparison of midbrain and thalamic space-specific neurons in barn owls.

Authors:  María Lucía Pérez; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Forebrain pathway for auditory space processing in the barn owl.

Authors:  Y E Cohen; G L Miller; E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Effects of interaural intensity difference on the processing of interaural time difference in the owl's nucleus laminaris.

Authors:  S Viete; J L Peña; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Activity of cells in the deeper layers of the superior colliculus of the rhesus monkey: evidence for a gaze displacement command.

Authors:  E G Freedman; D L Sparks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Head-related transfer functions of the barn owl: measurement and neural responses.

Authors:  C H Keller; K Hartung; T T Takahashi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Phase locking to high frequencies in the auditory nerve and cochlear nucleus magnocellularis of the barn owl, Tyto alba.

Authors:  C Köppl
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  How the owl resolves auditory coding ambiguity.

Authors:  J A Mazer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  8 in total

1.  Stimulus-specific adaptation: can it be a neural correlate of behavioral habituation?

Authors:  Shai Netser; Yael Zahar; Yoram Gutfreund
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Role of the zebra finch auditory thalamus in generating complex representations for natural sounds.

Authors:  Noopur Amin; Patrick Gill; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Stimulus-specific adaptation to visual but not auditory motion direction in the barn owl's optic tectum.

Authors:  Dante F Wasmuht; Jose L Pena; Yoram Gutfreund
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Population-wide bias of surround suppression in auditory spatial receptive fields of the owl's midbrain.

Authors:  Yunyan Wang; Sharad J Shanbhag; Brian J Fischer; José L Peña
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Owl's behavior and neural representation predicted by Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Brian J Fischer; José Luis Peña
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-03       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  The representation of sound localization cues in the barn owl's inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Martin Singheiser; Yoram Gutfreund; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.492

7.  Combination of Interaural Level and Time Difference in Azimuthal Sound Localization in Owls.

Authors:  Lutz Kettler; Hannah Griebel; Roland Ferger; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2017-12-14

8.  Distinct Correlation Structure Supporting a Rate-Code for Sound Localization in the Owl's Auditory Forebrain.

Authors:  Michael V Beckert; Rodrigo Pavão; José L Peña
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2017-06-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.