Literature DB >> 17615132

Emergence of multiplicative auditory responses in the midbrain of the barn owl.

Brian J Fischer1, José Luis Peña, Masakazu Konishi.   

Abstract

Space-specific neurons in the barn owl's auditory space map gain spatial selectivity through tuning to combinations of the interaural time difference (ITD) and interaural level difference (ILD). The combination of ITD and ILD in the subthreshold responses of space-specific neurons in the external nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICx) is well described by a multiplication of ITD- and ILD-dependent components. It is unknown, however, how ITD and ILD are combined at the site of ITD and ILD convergence in the lateral shell of the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICcl) and therefore whether ICx is the first site in the auditory pathway where multiplicative tuning to ITD- and ILD-dependent signals occurs. We used extracellular recording of single neurons to determine how ITD and ILD are combined in ICcl of the anesthetized barn owl (Tyto alba). A comparison of additive, multiplicative, and linear-threshold models of neural responses shows that ITD and ILD are combined nonlinearly in ICcl, but the interaction of ITD and ILD is not uniformly multiplicative over the sample. A subset (61%) of the neural responses is well described by the multiplicative model, indicating that ICcl is the first site where multiplicative tuning to ITD- and ILD-dependent signals occurs. ICx, however, is the first site where multiplicative tuning is observed consistently. A network model shows that a linear combination of ICcl responses to ITD-ILD pairs is sufficient to produce the multiplicative subthreshold responses to ITD and ILD seen in ICx.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17615132      PMCID: PMC2532518          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00370.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  37 in total

1.  Computation of different optical variables of looming objects in pigeon nucleus rotundus neurons.

Authors:  H Sun; B J Frost
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Cellular mechanisms for resolving phase ambiguity in the owl's inferior colliculus.

Authors:  J L Peña; M Konishi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  From postsynaptic potentials to spikes in the genesis of auditory spatial receptive fields.

Authors:  Jose Luis Pena; Masakazu Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements.

Authors:  R A Andersen; L H Snyder; D C Bradley; J Xing
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 12.449

5.  Projections of the cochlear nuclei and nucleus laminaris to the inferior colliculus of the barn owl.

Authors:  T T Takahashi; M Konishi
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1988-08-08       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Computational structure of a biological motion-detection system as revealed by local detector analysis in the fly's nervous system.

Authors:  M Egelhaaf; A Borst; W Reichardt
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Experience-dependent plasticity in the inferior colliculus: a site for visual calibration of the neural representation of auditory space in the barn owl.

Authors:  M S Brainard; E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Representation of multiple sound sources in the owl's auditory space map.

Authors:  T T Takahashi; C H Keller
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Time and intensity cues are processed independently in the auditory system of the owl.

Authors:  T Takahashi; A Moiseff; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Subdivisions of the inferior colliculus in the barn owl (Tyto alba).

Authors:  E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1983-08-01       Impact factor: 3.215

View more
  13 in total

1.  Variability reduction in interaural time difference tuning in the barn owl.

Authors:  Brian J Fischer; Masakazu Konishi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Auditory processing, plasticity, and learning in the barn owl.

Authors:  Jose L Pena; William M DeBello
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2010

3.  Two Types of Auditory Spatial Receptive Fields in Different Parts of the Chicken's Midbrain.

Authors:  Gianmarco Maldarelli; Uwe Firzlaff; Lutz Kettler; Janie M Ondracek; Harald Luksch
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 6.709

4.  A dominance hierarchy of auditory spatial cues in barn owls.

Authors:  Ilana B Witten; Phyllis F Knudsen; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effect of Stimulus-Dependent Spike Timing on Population Coding of Sound Location in the Owl's Auditory Midbrain.

Authors:  M V Beckert; B J Fischer; J L Pena
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-04-23

6.  Optimal nonlinear cue integration for sound localization.

Authors:  Brian J Fischer; Jose Luis Peña
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 1.621

7.  Optimizing Semantic Pointer Representations for Symbol-Like Processing in Spiking Neural Networks.

Authors:  Jan Gosmann; Chris Eliasmith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Multiplicative auditory spatial receptive fields created by a hierarchy of population codes.

Authors:  Brian J Fischer; Charles H Anderson; José Luis Peña
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The representation of sound localization cues in the barn owl's inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Martin Singheiser; Yoram Gutfreund; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.492

10.  Spike-threshold adaptation predicted by membrane potential dynamics in vivo.

Authors:  Bertrand Fontaine; José Luis Peña; Romain Brette
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.