Literature DB >> 11518371

Defunctioning loop ileostomy and stapled side-to-side closure has low morbidity.

S N Amin1, M A Memon, N C Armitage, J H Scholefield.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Low pelvic anastomoses are associated with a high leak rate. Therefore, defunctioning loop ileostomies are being increasingly fashioned to protect against the consequences of a leak. However, the reported complication rates of such stoma creation and closure is between 5.7-69%. AIMS: To determine the outcome associated with construction and side-to-side closure of loop ileostomies in one specialist unit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were obtained from a computer audit and case note analysis.
RESULTS: Between 1994 and 1998, 71 patients (41 M, 30 F) with a median age of 51 years (range 19-88 years) had a loop ileostomy constructed for: (i) 26 ileoanal pouches; (ii) 36 left colonic and rectal resections; and (iii) 9 for other reasons. Side-to-side stoma closure was achieved using a GIA linear stapler through a parastomal incision. The median hospital stay following stoma creation was 12 days (range 7-63 days) and stoma closure was 7 days (range 6-16 days). The median time to closure was 140 days (range 10-790 days). There were no ileostomy-related deaths. There were 10 (13.8%) ileostomy-related complications, 4 following creation and 6 following closure.
CONCLUSIONS: Loop ileostomy is easy to create and close and is associated with a low morbidity. Therefore, we recommend a defunctioning ileostomy as a procedure of choice for temporary faecal diversion for complex colorectal surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11518371      PMCID: PMC2503368     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  26 in total

1.  Techniques and complications of ileostomy takedown.

Authors:  P T Phang; J M Hain; J J Perez-Ramirez; R D Madoff; B T Gemlo
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Risk of peritonitis and fatal septicaemia and the need to defunction the low anastomosis.

Authors:  N D Karanjia; A P Corder; P J Holdsworth; R J Heald
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Temporary loop ileostomy following restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  K B Hosie; S P Grobler; M R Keighley
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Complications following closure of loop ileostomy.

Authors:  L J Mann; P J Stewart; R J Goodwin; P H Chapuis; E L Bokey
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1991-07

5.  Loop ileostomy after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis--is it necessary?

Authors:  M C Winslet; G Barsoum; W Pringle; K Fox; M R Keighley
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  The outcome of loop ileostomy closure in 293 cases.

Authors:  H D van de Pavoordt; V W Fazio; D G Jagelman; I C Lavery; F L Weakley
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Comparison of restorative proctocolectomy with and without covering ileostomy in ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  H J Järvinen; P Luukkonen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Closure of loop ileostomy after restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  P Lewis; D C Bartolo
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Complications of loop ileostomy.

Authors:  S M Feinberg; R S McLeod; Z Cohen
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  De-functioning stomas: a prospective controlled trial comparing loop ileostomy with loop transverse colostomy.

Authors:  N S Williams; D G Nasmyth; D Jones; A H Smith
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases.

Authors:  Andre Chow; Henry S Tilney; Paraskevas Paraskeva; Santhini Jeyarajah; Emmanouil Zacharakis; Sanjay Purkayastha
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of incisional hernia post-reversal of ileostomy.

Authors:  F De Haes; N L Bullen; G A Antoniou; N J Smart; S A Antoniou
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Incidence and predictors of postoperative ileus after loop ileostomy closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Richard Garfinkle; Paul Savage; Marylise Boutros; Tara Landry; Pauline Reynier; Nancy Morin; Carol-Ann Vasilevsky; Kristian B Filion
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the incidence of incisional hernia at the site of stoma closure.

Authors:  Aneel Bhangu; Dmitri Nepogodiev; Kaori Futaba
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Ileostomy reversal with handsewn techniques. Short-term outcomes in a teaching hospital.

Authors:  Gaetano Luglio; Francesco Terracciano; Mariano Cesare Giglio; Michele Sacco; Roberto Peltrini; Viviana Sollazzo; Emanuela Spadarella; Cristina Bucci; Giovanni Domenico De Palma; Luigi Bucci
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Wound infection following stoma takedown: primary skin closure versus subcuticular purse-string suture.

Authors:  Thao T Marquez; Dimitrios Christoforidis; Anasooya Abraham; Robert D Madoff; David A Rothenberger
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Stapled ileostomy closure results in reduction of postoperative morbidity.

Authors:  Y A Shelygin; S V Chernyshov; E G Rybakov
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Complications of loop ileostomy closure: a retrospective cohort analysis of 123 patients.

Authors:  S D Mansfield; C Jensen; A S Phair; O T Kelly; S B Kelly
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Postoperative management after loop ileostomy closure: are we keeping patients in hospital too long?

Authors:  W Baraza; J Wild; W Barber; S Brown
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  [Oncologic surgical procedures in ambulatory and brief inpatient surgery].

Authors:  J Fahlke; F Eder; M Pross; H Lippert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.