Literature DB >> 14991176

[Oncologic surgical procedures in ambulatory and brief inpatient surgery].

J Fahlke1, F Eder, M Pross, H Lippert.   

Abstract

The number of surgical interventions in an outpatient clinic setting has continuously increased. An important advantage of such approach is the low infection rate. From an economic point of view, this setting leads to lower costs and, subsequently, lower charges to the health insurance companies according to the today's contracts. However, an essential prediction for surgical interventions in an outpatient clinic setting is that there is no increased risk compared with interventions of hospitalized patients. Taking this in consideration, we conclude that the very specific onco-surgical interventions can only be executed in a hospital setting because of their risk profile and the characteristics of tumor patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14991176     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-003-0799-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  19 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a review of indications, complications and outcome.

Authors:  F B Nicholson; M G Korman; M A Richardson
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.029

2.  Early oral nutrition after elective colorectal surgery: influence of balanced analgesia and enforced mobilization.

Authors:  Morten Gaarden Henriksen; Henriette V Hansen; Ib Hessov
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.008

3.  Colostomy closure after Hartmann's procedure with fast-track rehabilitation.

Authors:  Linda Basse; Dorthe Hjort Jacobsen; Per Billesbølle; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Closure of transverse loop colostomy and loop ileostomy.

Authors:  D P Edwards; E M Chisholm; D R Donaldson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 5.  [Ambulatory surgery--limits and risks from the viewpoint of the established physician].

Authors:  J A Rüggeberg
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 6.  [Evidence-based surgery of rectal carcinoma].

Authors:  R Kasperk; S Willis; K P Riesener; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 0.942

7.  An assessment of open access referral for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in a district general hospital.

Authors:  Mark R Fox; Adam W Harris
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.566

8.  Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for defunctioning low anastomoses during rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  E Rullier; N Le Toux; C Laurent; J L Garrelon; M Parneix; J Saric
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Influence of a defunctioning stoma on leakage rates after low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  N Dehni; R D Schlegel; C Cunningham; M Guiguet; E Tiret; R Parc
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Comparative outcomes analysis of procedures performed in physician offices and ambulatory surgery centers.

Authors:  Hector Vila; Roy Soto; Alan B Cantor; David Mackey
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-09
View more
  1 in total

1.  [§ 116b SGB V (social insurance code, book five) for rheumatology patients. An empirical assessment on the basis of administrative data].

Authors:  T Rath; E Bokern; E Sefo-Bukow; G Büscher; M Lüngen; A Rubbert-Roth
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.372

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.