Literature DB >> 3320231

The outcome of loop ileostomy closure in 293 cases.

H D van de Pavoordt1, V W Fazio, D G Jagelman, I C Lavery, F L Weakley.   

Abstract

Our experience with closure of loop ileostomies between the years 1975-1986 was reviewed. Ninety-three percent of stoma closures were done by simple transverse suture. The overall complication rate was 17%. Of the early postoperative complications (13%), the major complication was small bowel obstruction especially in patients where the stoma was protecting a pelvic ileal reservoir. Abdominal septic complications (postclosure) were rare (1%). These were generally caused by unrecognized enteric tears during the mobilization of the stoma rather than anastomotic leakage. A careful operative technique is required. The wound infection rate after healing by both secondary intention and primary skin closure was low (3%) and mainly superficial. Only one incisional hernia was observed in the late postoperative period. In three patients a posterior rectus sheath defect at the stoma site was found incidentally at laparotomy, without clinical evidence of an incisional hernia. Closure of a loop ileostomy is a safe operation with a low morbidity. In patients with a previous total colectomy there was a significant risk of small bowel obstruction after ileostomy closure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3320231     DOI: 10.1007/BF01649508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  7 in total

1.  Intestinal obstruction following operation for inflammatory disease of the bowel.

Authors:  E S Hughes; F T McDermott; J P Masterton
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Loop ileostomy: a superior diverting stoma in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  S Fasth; L Hultén
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  The causes and prevention of intestinal adhesions.

Authors:  H Ellis
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Complications of colostomy closure.

Authors:  D M Pittman; L E Smith
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Complications of loop ileostomy.

Authors:  S M Feinberg; R S McLeod; Z Cohen
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  De-functioning stomas: a prospective controlled trial comparing loop ileostomy with loop transverse colostomy.

Authors:  N S Williams; D G Nasmyth; D Jones; A H Smith
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Temporary ileostomy for ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Function and complications.

Authors:  A M Metcalf; R R Dozois; R W Beart; K A Kelly; B G Wolff
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 4.585

  7 in total
  24 in total

1.  The effect of faecal diversion on human ileum.

Authors:  Leith Williams; Matthew J Armstrong; Matthew Armstrong; Paul Finan; Peter Sagar; Dermot Burke
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases.

Authors:  Andre Chow; Henry S Tilney; Paraskevas Paraskeva; Santhini Jeyarajah; Emmanouil Zacharakis; Sanjay Purkayastha
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Postoperative complications after closure of a diverting ileostoma--differences according to closure technique.

Authors:  Kajsa Gustavsson; Ulf Gunnarsson; Pia Jestin
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Closure of transverse loop colostomy and loop ileostomy.

Authors:  D P Edwards; E M Chisholm; D R Donaldson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Protective colostomy closure: the hazards of a "minor" operation.

Authors:  D F Altomare; O C Pannarale; L Lupo; N Palasciano; V Memeo; M Rubino
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  The effect of purse-string approximation versus linear approximation of ileostomy reversal wounds on morbidity rates and patient satisfaction: the 'STOMA' trial.

Authors:  D P O'Leary; M Carter; D Wijewardene; M Burton; D Waldron; E Condon; J C Coffey; C Peirce
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  Influence of neoadjuvant radiotherapy on anastomotic leak after restorative resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Pasha J Nisar; Ian C Lavery; Ravi P Kiran
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Complications of loop ileostomy closure: a retrospective cohort analysis of 123 patients.

Authors:  S D Mansfield; C Jensen; A S Phair; O T Kelly; S B Kelly
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Enterostomy closure site hernias: a clinical and ultrasonographic evaluation.

Authors:  A Cingi; A Solmaz; W Attaallah; A Aslan; A O Aktan
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  Prophylactic mesh reinforcement reduces stomal site incisional hernia after ileostomy closure.

Authors:  David Shi Hao Liu; Elisabeth Banham; Srinivasa Yellapu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.