Literature DB >> 20013018

Stapled ileostomy closure results in reduction of postoperative morbidity.

Y A Shelygin1, S V Chernyshov, E G Rybakov.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Loop ileostomy is widely employed as a defunctioning procedure for left-sided colonic anastomoses. Closure of the stoma carries a risk of morbidity and even mortality. The aim of this prospective trial was to evaluate the ability of stapled stoma closure to decrease the rates of perioperative morbidity.
METHODS: One hundred and nineteen patients (mean age 56.2 +/- 5.4 years) underwent two-stage operations for rectal carcinoma with protective loop ileostomy between 2005 and 2008. All patients were randomly divided into two groups: 56 patients had conventional ileostomy takedown, while in the other 63, a functional end-to-end anastomosis was created using a linear stapler. Groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, body mass index, and other parameters.
RESULTS: Mean time of stoma closure using functional end-to-end anastomosis was 68 +/- 7, when compared to 92 +/- 11 min (P = 0.01) for conventional stoma closure. The overall morbidity rate after ileostomy closure using a stapler was 3.2%: one patient (1.6%) developed a wound infection and self-limited bleeding from the anastomotic line, while another patient (1.6%) had an ileal obstruction caused by adhesions and required additional intervention. Conventional ileostomy closure resulted in a 14.3% morbidity rate: six patients (10.7%) had prolonged ileus, 2 (3.6%) had small bowel obstruction, and 2 (3.6%) had wound infections (P = 0.04).
CONCLUSION: Functional end-to-end anastomosis reduces operating time and morbidity compared to conventional ileostomy takedown.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20013018     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-009-0550-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  12 in total

Review 1.  The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases.

Authors:  Andre Chow; Henry S Tilney; Paraskevas Paraskeva; Santhini Jeyarajah; Emmanouil Zacharakis; Sanjay Purkayastha
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Complications following closure of loop ileostomy.

Authors:  L J Mann; P J Stewart; R J Goodwin; P H Chapuis; E L Bokey
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1991-07

3.  Morbidity of ileostomy and colostomy closure: impact of surgical technique and perioperative treatment.

Authors:  K P Riesener; W Lehnen; M Höfer; R Kasperk; J C Braun; V Schumpelick
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Comparison of sutured and stapled closure of loop ileostomy after restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  I M Bain; R Patel; M R Keighley
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  A new technique of loop ileostomy closure after endorectal ileoanal anastomosis.

Authors:  A Kestenberg; J M Becker
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  A prospective audit of the complications of loop ileostomy construction and takedown.

Authors:  S A García-Botello; J García-Armengol; E García-Granero; A Espí; C Juan; F López-Mozos; S Lledó
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 2.588

7.  Stapled versus sutured closure of loop ileostomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  H Hasegawa; S Radley; D G Morton; M R Keighley
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Defunctioning loop ileostomy and stapled side-to-side closure has low morbidity.

Authors:  S N Amin; M A Memon; N C Armitage; J H Scholefield
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Morbidity of ostomy takedown.

Authors:  Andreas M Kaiser; Shlomo Israelit; Daniel Klaristenfeld; Paul Selvindoss; Petar Vukasin; Glenn Ault; Robert W Beart
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Defunctioning loop ileostomy: a prospective audit.

Authors:  G C O'Toole; J M Hyland; D C Grant; M K Barry
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.113

View more
  18 in total

1.  Loop ileostomy closure: comparison of cost effectiveness between suture and stapler.

Authors:  Karoline Horisberger; Guido Beldi; Daniel Candinas
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Hand suture versus stapler for closure of loop ileostomy--a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Thorsten Löffler; Inga Rossion; Käthe Gooßen; Daniel Saure; Jürgen Weitz; Alexis Ulrich; Markus W Büchler; Markus K Diener
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Relationship between functional end-to-end anastomosis for colon cancer and surgical site infections.

Authors:  Hitoshi Ojima; Makoto Sohda; Hiroyuki Ando; Akihiko Sano; Yasuyuki Fukai; Atsushi Ogawa; Yasushi Mochida; Hiroyuki Kuwano
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Incidence and predictors of postoperative ileus after loop ileostomy closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Richard Garfinkle; Paul Savage; Marylise Boutros; Tara Landry; Pauline Reynier; Nancy Morin; Carol-Ann Vasilevsky; Kristian B Filion
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Application of an enhanced recovery pathway for ileostomy closure: a case-control trial with surprising results.

Authors:  J Slieker; M Hübner; V Addor; C Duvoisin; N Demartines; D Hahnloser
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Risk Factors for Prolonged Postoperative Ileus in Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrea Carolina Quiroga-Centeno; Kihara Alejandra Jerez-Torra; Pedro Antonio Martin-Mojica; Sergio Andrés Castañeda-Alfonso; María Emma Castillo-Sánchez; Oscar Fernando Calvo-Corredor; Sergio Alejandro Gómez-Ochoa
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Italian guidelines for the surgical management of enteral stomas in adults.

Authors:  F Ferrara; D Parini; A Bondurri; M Veltri; M Barbierato; F Pata; F Cattaneo; A Tafuri; C Forni; G Roveron; G Rizzo
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 8.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of published, randomized, controlled trials comparing suture anastomosis to stapled anastomosis for ileostomy closure.

Authors:  M S Sajid; L Craciunas; M K Baig; P Sains
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Morbidities after closure of ileostomy: analysis of risk factors.

Authors:  Vivian Chi Mei Man; Hok Kwok Choi; Wai Lun Law; Dominic Chi Chung Foo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Risk Factors for Postoperative Complications Following Diverting Loop Ileostomy Takedown.

Authors:  Anuradha R Bhama; Farwa Batool; Stacey D Collins; Jane Ferraro; Robert K Cleary
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.