Literature DB >> 11425131

Children's detection of pure-tone signals with random multitone maskers.

E L Oh1, F Wightman, R A Lutfi.   

Abstract

Preschoolers and adults were asked to detect a 1000-Hz signal, which was masked by a multitone complex. The frequencies and amplitudes of the components in the complex varied randomly and independently on each presentation. A staircase, cued two-interval, forced-choice procedure disguised as a "listening game" was used to obtain signal thresholds in quiet and in the presence of the multitone maskers. The number of components in the masker was fixed within an experimental condition and varied from 2 to 906 across experimental conditions. Thresholds were also measured with a broadband noise masker. Eight preschool children and eight adults were tested. Although individual differences were large, among both adults and children, there was little difference between the groups in the mean amount of masking produced by the maskers with large numbers of components (400 and 906). There was also a small but significant difference between adults and children in the mean amount of masking produced by the broadband noise. The difference between the groups was much larger with smaller numbers of components. Data obtained from the adults were basically similar to that previously reported [cf. Neff and Green, Percept. Psychophys. 41, 409-415 (1987); Oh and Lutfi, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104, 3489-3499 (1998)]: maskers comprised of 10-40 components produced as much as 30 to 60 dB of masking in some, but not all listeners. Those same maskers produced larger amounts of masking (70-83 dB) in many of the preschool children, although, as in the adult group, individual differences were large. The component-relative-entropy (CoRE) model [Lutfi, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94, 748-758 (1993)] was used to describe the differences in performance between the children and adults. According to this model the average child appears to integrate information over a larger number of auditory filters than the average adult.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11425131      PMCID: PMC2858975          DOI: 10.1121/1.1371764

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  20 in total

1.  Notched-noise measures of frequency selectivity in adults and children using fixed-masker-level and fixed-signal-level presentation.

Authors:  J W Hall; J H Grose
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1991-06

2.  Spectral pattern discrimination by children.

Authors:  P Allen; F Wightman
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1992-02

3.  Effects of signal and masker uncertainty on children's detection.

Authors:  P Allen; F Wightman
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1995-04

4.  Nonmonotonicity of informational masking.

Authors:  E L Oh; R A Lutfi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Individual differences in simultaneous masking with random-frequency, multicomponent maskers.

Authors:  D L Neff; T M Dethlefs
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Psychometric functions for children's detection of tones in noise.

Authors:  P Allen; F Wightman
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1994-02

7.  Developmental patterns of duration discrimination.

Authors:  J L Elfenbein; A M Small; J M Davis
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1993-08

8.  A model of auditory pattern analysis based on component-relative-entropy.

Authors:  R A Lutfi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Spectral weights in level discrimination by preschool children: analytic listening conditions.

Authors:  M A Stellmack; M S Willihnganz; F L Wightman; R A Lutfi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Gap detection in infants, children, and adults.

Authors:  S E Trehub; B A Schneider; J L Henderson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  31 in total

1.  Psychometric functions for informational masking.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Doris J Kistler; Michael R Callahan; Frederic L Wightman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Individual differences and age effects in a dichotic informational masking paradigm.

Authors:  Frederic L Wightman; Doris J Kistler; Amanda O'Bryan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Linguistically-based informational masking in preschool children.

Authors:  Rochelle S Newman; Giovanna Morini; Faraz Ahsan; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of Self-Generated Noise on Estimates of Detection Threshold in Quiet for School-Age Children and Adults.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Heather L Porter; Lori J Leibold; John H Grose; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Gap detection in school-age children and adults: effects of inherent envelope modulation and the availability of cues across frequency.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall; Heather Porter; John H Grose
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 6.  Development of the auditory system.

Authors:  Ruth Litovsky
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2015

7.  Age-related differences in weighting and masking of two cues to word-final stop voicing in noise.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Informational masking release in children and adults.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Informational masking of speech in children: effects of ipsilateral and contralateral distracters.

Authors:  Frederic L Wightman; Doris J Kistler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The Effect of Remote Masking on the Reception of Speech by Young School-Age Children.

Authors:  Carla L Youngdahl; Eric W Healy; Sarah E Yoho; Frédéric Apoux; Rachael Frush Holt
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.