Literature DB >> 24686553

Gap detection in school-age children and adults: effects of inherent envelope modulation and the availability of cues across frequency.

Emily Buss, Joseph W Hall, Heather Porter, John H Grose.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The present study evaluated the effects of inherent envelope modulation and the availability of cues across frequency on behavioral gap detection with noise-band stimuli in school-age children.
METHOD: Listeners were 34 normal-hearing children (ages 5.2-15.6 years) and 12 normal-hearing adults (ages 18.5-28.8 years). Stimuli were continuous bands of noise centered on 2000 Hz, either 1000- or 25-Hz wide. In addition to Gaussian noise at these bandwidths, there were conditions using 25-Hz-wide noise bands modified to either accentuate or minimize inherent envelope modulation (staccato and low-fluctuation noise, respectively).
RESULTS: Within the 25-Hz-wide conditions, adults' gap detection thresholds were highest in the staccato, lower in the Gaussian, and lowest in the low-fluctuation noise. Similar trends were evident in children's thresholds, although inherent envelope modulation had a smaller effect on children than on adults. Whereas adults' thresholds were comparable for the 1000-Hz-wide Gaussian and 25-Hz-wide low-fluctuation stimulus, children's performance converged on adults' performance at a younger age for the 1000-Hz-wide Gaussian stimulus.
CONCLUSIONS: Results are consistent with the idea that children are less susceptible to the disruptive effects of inherent envelope modulation than adults when detecting a gap in a narrow-band noise. Further, the ability to use spectrally distributed gap detection cues appears to mature relatively early in childhood.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24686553      PMCID: PMC4136410          DOI: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-H-13-0132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  41 in total

1.  Individual differences and age effects in a dichotic informational masking paradigm.

Authors:  Frederic L Wightman; Doris J Kistler; Amanda O'Bryan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Gap detection in modulated noise: across-frequency facilitation and interference.

Authors:  John H Grose; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Brainstem correlates of temporal auditory processing in children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  Madhavi Basu; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Christine Weber-Fox
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2010-01-01

4.  The monaural temporal window based on masking period pattern data in school-aged children and adults.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Shuman He; John H Grose; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Factors affecting the processing of intensity in school-aged children.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall; John H Grose
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Development and the role of internal noise in detection and discrimination thresholds with narrow band stimuli.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Monaural temporal integration and temporally selective listening in children and adults.

Authors:  Shuman He; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The development of temporal resolution: between-channel gap detection in infants and adults.

Authors:  Nicholas A Smith; Laurel J Trainor; David I Shore
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Psychometric functions for pure tone intensity discrimination: slope differences in school-aged children and adults.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Effects of masker-spectral variability and masker fringes in children and adults.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Donna L Neff
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  6 in total

1.  The effect of noise fluctuation and spectral bandwidth on gap detection.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss; Erol J Ozmeral; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Forward and Backward Masking of Consonants in School-Age Children and Adults.

Authors:  Heather L Porter; Emily R Spitzer; Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold; John H Grose
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Acoustically evoked auditory change complex in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder: a potential objective tool for identifying cochlear implant candidates.

Authors:  Shuman He; John H Grose; Holly F B Teagle; Jennifer Woodard; Lisa R Park; Debora R Hatch; Patricia Roush; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Gap Detection in School-Age Children and Adults: Center Frequency and Ramp Duration.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Heather L Porter; Joseph W Hall; John H Grose
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  The Influence of Hearing Aid Gain on Gap-Detection Thresholds for Children and Adults With Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Marc A Brennan; Ryan W McCreery; Emily Buss; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Auditory temporal resolution in adaptive tasks. Gap detection investigation.

Authors:  Abdulsalam A Alhaidary; Kishore Tanniru; Adel F Aljadaan; Lamya M Alabdulkarim
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.484

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.