Literature DB >> 20649222

Individual differences and age effects in a dichotic informational masking paradigm.

Frederic L Wightman1, Doris J Kistler, Amanda O'Bryan.   

Abstract

Sixty normally-hearing listeners, ages 5 to 61 years, participated in a monaural speech understanding task designed to assess the impact of a single-talker speech masker presented to the opposite ear. The speech targets were masked by ipsilateral speech-spectrum noise. Masker level was fixed and target level was varied to estimate psychometric functions. The target/masker ratio that led to 51% correct performance in this task was taken as the baseline threshold. The impact of a modulated speech-spectrum noise, a male talker, or a female talker presented at a fixed level to the contralateral ear was quantified by the change in the baseline threshold and was assumed to reflect informational masking. The modulated-noise masker produced no informational masking across the entire age range. Speech maskers produced as much as 20 dB of informational masking for children aged 5-8 years and only 4 dB for adults. In contrast with previous studies using ipsilateral speech maskers, the male and female contralateral speech maskers produced comparable informational masking. Analyses of the developmental rate of change for informational masking and of the patterns of individual differences suggest that the informational masking produced by contralateral and ipsilateral maskers may be mediated by different mechanisms or processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20649222      PMCID: PMC2921429          DOI: 10.1121/1.3436536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  53 in total

1.  Evaluation of speech intelligibility with the coordinate response measure.

Authors:  D S Brungart
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Imaging the developing brain: what have we learned about cognitive development?

Authors:  B J Casey; Nim Tottenham; Conor Liston; Sarah Durston
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Informational masking release in children and adults.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Across-ear interference from parametrically degraded synthetic speech signals in a dichotic cocktail-party listening task.

Authors:  Douglas S Brungart; Brian D Simpson; Christopher J Darwin; Tanya L Arbogast; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  An event-related potential study of selective auditory attention in children and adults.

Authors:  Donna Coch; Lisa D Sanders; Helen J Neville
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Combining energetic and informational masking for speech identification.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Frederick J Gallun
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Informational masking of speech in children: effects of ipsilateral and contralateral distracters.

Authors:  Frederic L Wightman; Doris J Kistler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Interference from audio distracters during speechreading.

Authors:  Douglas S Brungart; Brian D Simpson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Nonmonotonicity of informational masking.

Authors:  E L Oh; R A Lutfi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking in young children.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  29 in total

1.  Spatial release from masking in children with bilateral cochlear implants and with normal hearing: Effect of target-interferer similarity.

Authors:  Sara M Misurelli; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of Self-Generated Noise on Estimates of Detection Threshold in Quiet for School-Age Children and Adults.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Heather L Porter; Lori J Leibold; John H Grose; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Gap detection in school-age children and adults: effects of inherent envelope modulation and the availability of cues across frequency.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall; Heather Porter; John H Grose
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  A New Speech-in-Noise Test for Measuring Informational Masking in Speech Perception Among Elderly Listeners.

Authors:  Marzieh Amiri; Farnoush Jarollahi; Shohreh Jalaie; Seyyed Jalal Sameni
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-03-21

5.  Developmental Effects in Masking Release for Speech-in-Speech Perception Due to a Target/Masker Sex Mismatch.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss; Lauren Calandruccio
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Competing speech perception in older and younger adults: behavioral and eye-movement evidence.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Adrian Staub
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Self-monitoring of listening abilities in normal-hearing children, normal-hearing adults, and children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ann M Rothpletz; Frederic L Wightman; Doris J Kistler
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.

Authors:  Terrin N Tamati; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) gene modulates the influence of informational masking on speech recognition.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; W Todd Maddox; Valerie S Knopik; John E McGeary; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.

Authors:  Terrin N Tamati; Jaimie L Gilbert; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.