Literature DB >> 16247871

Informational masking release in children and adults.

Joseph W Hall1, Emily Buss, John H Grose.   

Abstract

This study assessed informational masking and utilization of cues to reduce that masking in children aged 4-9 years and in adults. The signal was a train of eight consecutive tone bursts, each at 1 kHz and 60 ms in duration. Maskers were comprised of a pair of synchronous tone-burst trains, with randomly chosen frequencies spanning 200-5000 Hz, with a protected region 851-1175 Hz. In the reference condition, maskers were eight bursts in duration, with a fixed frequency within intervals. Experiment 1 tested two monotic masking release conditions: within-interval randomization of masker burst frequency and the introduction of leading masker bursts. Experiment 2 examined masking release in which the signal was presented to one ear and masking components were presented to both ears (masker components in the contralateral ear were 10 dB higher than those in the ipsilateral ear). Both adults and children demonstrated a significant informational masking effect, with children showing a larger effect on average. Both groups also showed significant release from masking in the two monotic conditions, although children received somewhat less benefit from the masking release cues. The binaural condition supported a moderate release from informational masking in adults, but resulted in increased informational masking in children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16247871      PMCID: PMC1810353          DOI: 10.1121/1.1992675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  26 in total

1.  Informational masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Tanya L Arbogast; Christine R Mason; Michael Walsh
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2002-06

2.  Informational masking caused by contralateral stimulation.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Tanya L Arbogast; Douglas S Brungart; Brian D Simpson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Note on informational masking.

Authors:  Nathaniel I Durlach; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd; Tanya L Arbogast; H Steven Colburn; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Informational masking: counteracting the effects of stimulus uncertainty by decreasing target-masker similarity.

Authors:  Nathaniel I Durlach; Christine R Mason; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Tanya L Arbogast; H Steven Colburn; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Masker-first advantage for cues in informational masking.

Authors:  Virginia M Richards; Rong Huang; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Streaming vs. fusion of sinusoidal components of complex tones.

Authors:  G L Dannenbring; A S Bregman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1978-10

8.  Perceiving vowels in the presence of another sound: constraints on formant perception.

Authors:  C J Darwin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Auditory streaming and the building of timbre.

Authors:  A S Bregman; S Pinker
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1978-03

10.  Children's detection of pure-tone signals: informational masking with contralateral maskers.

Authors:  Frederic L Wightman; Michael R Callahan; Robert A Lutfi; Doris J Kistler; Eunmi Oh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  27 in total

1.  Masker location uncertainty reveals evidence for suppression of maskers in two-talker contexts.

Authors:  Kachina Allen; David Alais; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham; Simon Carlile
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Individual differences and age effects in a dichotic informational masking paradigm.

Authors:  Frederic L Wightman; Doris J Kistler; Amanda O'Bryan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of Self-Generated Noise on Estimates of Detection Threshold in Quiet for School-Age Children and Adults.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Heather L Porter; Lori J Leibold; John H Grose; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Comodulation detection differences for fixed-frequency and roved-frequency maskers.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Gap duration discrimination for frequency-asymmetric gap markers: psychophysical and electrophysiological findings.

Authors:  John H Grose; Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Speech intelligibility in free field: spatial unmasking in preschool children.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Release from informational masking in children: effect of multiple signal bursts.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Angela Yarnell Bonino
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Infants use onset asynchrony cues in auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Monika-Maria Oster; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Comodulation detection differences in children and adults.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Effect of signal-temporal uncertainty in children and adults: tone detection in noise or a random-frequency masker.

Authors:  Angela Yarnell Bonino; Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.