Literature DB >> 16158662

Age-related differences in weighting and masking of two cues to word-final stop voicing in noise.

Susan Nittrouer1.   

Abstract

Because laboratory studies are conducted in optimal listening conditions, often with highly stylized stimuli that attenuate or eliminate some naturally occurring cues, results may have constrained applicability to the "real world." Such studies show that English-speaking adults weight vocalic duration greatly and formant offsets slightly in voicing decisions for word-final obstruents. Using more natural stimuli, Nittrouer [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 1777-1790 (2004)] found different results, raising questions about what would happen if experimental conditions were even more like the real world. In this study noise was used to simulate the real world. Edited natural words with voiced and voiceless final stops were presented in quiet and noise to adults and children (4 to 8 years) for labeling. Hypotheses tested were (1) Adults (and perhaps older children) would weight vocalic duration more in noise than in quiet; (2) Previously reported age-related differences in cue weighting might not be found in this real-world simulation; and (3) Children would experience greater masking than adults. Results showed: (1) no increase for any age listeners in the weighting of vocalic duration in noise; (2) age-related differences in the weighting of cues in both quiet and noise; and (3) masking effects for all listeners, but more so for children than adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16158662      PMCID: PMC1352340          DOI: 10.1121/1.1940508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  40 in total

1.  On the bistability of sine wave analogues of speech.

Authors:  R E Remez; J S Pardo; R L Piorkowski; P E Rubin
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-01

2.  The effect of segmental order on fricative labeling by children and adults.

Authors:  S Nittrouer; M E Miller; C S Crowther; M J Manhart
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-02

3.  Native language factors affecting use of vocalic cues to final consonant voicing in English.

Authors:  C S Crowther; V Mann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Do temporal processing deficits cause phonological processing problems?

Authors:  S Nittrouer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Effects of lexical meaning and practiced productions on coarticulation in children's and adults' speech.

Authors:  K A Siren; K A Wilcox
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1995-04

6.  Frequency-weighting functions for broadband speech as estimated by a correlational method.

Authors:  C W Turner; B J Kwon; C Tanaka; J Knapp; J L Hubbartt; K A Doherty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Vowel perception by adults and children with normal language and specific language impairment: based on steady states or transitions?

Authors:  J E Sussman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Deficits in auditory temporal and spectral resolution in language-impaired children.

Authors:  B A Wright; L J Lombardino; W M King; C S Puranik; C M Leonard; M M Merzenich
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-05-08       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Intensity discrimination under forward and backward masking: role of referential coding.

Authors:  C J Plack; R P Carlyon; N F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Children's detection of pure-tone signals with random multitone maskers.

Authors:  E L Oh; F Wightman; R A Lutfi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  17 in total

1.  Word Recognition Variability With Cochlear Implants: "Perceptual Attention" Versus "Auditory Sensitivity".

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Joanna H Lowenstein; Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Effects of Age and Cochlear Implantation on Spectrally Cued Speech Categorization.

Authors:  Mishaela DiNino; Julie G Arenberg; Anne L R Duchen; Matthew B Winn
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Do adults with cochlear implants rely on different acoustic cues for phoneme perception than adults with normal hearing?

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Joanna H Lowenstein; Eric Tarr; Amanda Caldwell-Tarr; D Bradley Welling; Antoine J Shahin; Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Acoustic cues to perception of word stress by English, Mandarin, and Russian speakers.

Authors:  Anna Chrabaszcz; Matthew Winn; Candise Y Lin; William J Idsardi
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  What is the deficit in phonological processing deficits: auditory sensitivity, masking, or category formation?

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Samantha Shune; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2010-12-15

6.  Acoustic Cue Weighting by Adults with Cochlear Implants: A Mismatch Negativity Study.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Jyoti Bhat; Antoine J Shahin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Neurophysiology of spectrotemporal cue organization of spoken language in auditory memory.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Jyoti Bhat; D Bradley Welling; Antoine J Shahin
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Attentional modulation of word recognition by children in a dual-task paradigm.

Authors:  Sangsook Choi; Andrew Lotto; Dawna Lewis; Brenda Hoover; Patricia Stelmachowicz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Issues in human auditory development.

Authors:  Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 2.288

10.  Acoustic cue integration in speech intonation recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Shu-Chen Peng; Monita Chatterjee; Nelson Lu
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-07-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.