Literature DB >> 7593935

Gap detection in infants, children, and adults.

S E Trehub1, B A Schneider, J L Henderson.   

Abstract

Listeners who were 6.5 months, 12 months, 5 years, and 21 years of age were required to discriminate a pair of 500-Hz, Gaussian-enveloped tone pips from a short 500-Hz tone of the same duration and total energy. Groups of 6.5-month-old infants were tested on a single gap duration: 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, or 40 ms. Groups of 12-month-olds were also tested on a single gap duration: 8, 12, 16, or 20 ms. The 5-year-old children and adults were tested on gap durations of 8, 12, and 16 ms. The mean performance of 6.5-month-olds significantly exceeded chance levels on all gap durations except 8 ms, and that of 12-month-olds was above chance levels on all gap durations. For 5-year-old children and adults, mean performance also exceeded chance levels for all gap durations tested. Adults performed significantly better than 5-year-old children on gap durations of 12 and 16 ms. Gap-detection thresholds, defined by a performance criterion of d' = 0.5, were estimated at 11, 5.6, and 5.2 ms for infants, children, and adults, respectively. It is likely that smaller adult-infant differences in the present study compared to those reported in previous research stem from our use of Gaussian-enveloped tone pips and the consequent minimization of adaptation effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7593935     DOI: 10.1121/1.414396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  32 in total

1.  Effect of lateralized gaps in noise on the cutaneous blink reflex in humans.

Authors:  G Hammond
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Assessing toddlers' speech-sound discrimination.

Authors:  Rachael Frush Holt; Kaylah Lalonde
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 1.675

3.  Gap detection in school-age children and adults: effects of inherent envelope modulation and the availability of cues across frequency.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall; Heather Porter; John H Grose
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Cognitive and linguistic sources of variance in 2-year-olds’ speech-sound discrimination: a preliminary investigation.

Authors:  Kaylah Lalonde; Rachael Frush Holt
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Environmental noise affects auditory temporal processing development and NMDA-2B receptor expression in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Wei Sun; Li Tang; Brian L Allman
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Preschoolers benefit from visually salient speech cues.

Authors:  Kaylah Lalonde; Rachael Frush Holt
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Impaired timing and frequency discrimination in high-functioning autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Anjali Bhatara; Talin Babikian; Elizabeth Laugeson; Raffi Tachdjian; Yvonne S Sininger
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2013-10

8.  The maturation of human evoked brain potentials to sounds presented at different stimulus rates.

Authors:  E Sussman; M Steinschneider; V Gumenyuk; J Grushko; K Lawson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Maturation of auditory temporal integration and inhibition assessed with event-related potentials (ERPs).

Authors:  Allison M Fox; Mike Anderson; Corinne Reid; Tim Smith; Dorothy V M Bishop
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Differential maturation of brain signal complexity in the human auditory and visual system.

Authors:  Sarah Lippé; Natasa Kovacevic; Anthony Randal McIntosh
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.