Literature DB >> 2072690

Notched-noise measures of frequency selectivity in adults and children using fixed-masker-level and fixed-signal-level presentation.

J W Hall1, J H Grose.   

Abstract

Three experiments were performed to examine the development of frequency selectivity and to attempt to separate peripheral versus central contributions to frequency selectivity. In Experiment 1, frequency selectivity was examined in 4-year-old children, 6-year-old children, and adults, using a fixed-masker-level, notched-noise masking method. Thresholds were determined in a no-notch condition and in conditions in which the notchwidth was 0.3 times the center frequency (0.3 x fc) or 0.6 x fc. The results for the adults and 6-year-olds were similar, but the notched-noise functions of the 4-year-old listeners were relatively shallow. These results were consistent with an interpretation that frequency selectivity is relatively poor in 4-year-old listeners; however, the results of the 4-year-old listeners might also be accounted for in terms of poor processing efficiency. For example, the children may require a relatively high level of signal-related excitation in order for detection to occur. If the growth of excitation is steeper in the no-notch condition than in notched-noise conditions, then thresholds in the notched-noise conditions might be elevated because of poor processing efficiency rather than poor frequency selectivity. This interpretation is consonant with past data showing that the growth of loudness of partially masked signals steepens as a function of increasing masker level: The masker level at the output of the auditory filter centered on the signal frequency would be less for the notched-noise masker than for the masker having no notch. In Experiment 2 the growth of loudness was examined for three adult listeners in the no-notch condition and the 0.6 x fc notched noise. Results showed a steeper growth of loudness in the no-notch case. In Experiment 3, a notched-noise measure of frequency selectivity was used in which the signal level was fixed at 15 dB SL and the masker level was varied adaptively. In this method the noise level at the output of the auditory filter centered on the signal should theoretically be constant over the different notch conditions. Adult and 4-year-old listeners were tested. The notched-noise functions were similar between the adult and 4-year-old listeners. This result supports an interpretation that the shallow notched-noise, fixed-masker-level functions of 4-year-old children may be due to poor processing efficiency rather than to poor peripheral frequency selectivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2072690     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3403.651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  17 in total

1.  Gap detection in school-age children and adults: effects of inherent envelope modulation and the availability of cues across frequency.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall; Heather Porter; John H Grose
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Developmental effects of multiple looks in speech sound discrimination.

Authors:  Rachael Frush Holt; Arlene Earley Carney
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Speech intelligibility in free field: spatial unmasking in preschool children.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Modulation masking and glimpsing of natural and vocoded speech during single-talker modulated noise: Effect of the modulation spectrum.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jiaqian Xu; Bobby E Gibbs
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The monaural temporal window based on masking period pattern data in school-aged children and adults.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Shuman He; John H Grose; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Yes/no and two-interval forced-choice tasks with listener-based vs observer-based responses.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Sensitivity of school-aged children to pitch-related cues.

Authors:  Mickael L D Deroche; Danielle J Zion; Jaclyn R Schurman; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  A behavioral framework to guide research on central auditory development and plasticity.

Authors:  Dan H Sanes; Sarah M N Woolley
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  The Effect of Remote Masking on the Reception of Speech by Young School-Age Children.

Authors:  Carla L Youngdahl; Eric W Healy; Sarah E Yoho; Frédéric Apoux; Rachael Frush Holt
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Psychometric functions for pure tone intensity discrimination: slope differences in school-aged children and adults.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.