Literature DB >> 25938063

Difference in normal corneal thickness and curvature between Mongolian and Han nationalities.

Hai-Xia Zhao1, Li Zhang1, Wen-Ying Guan1.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the differences in central corneal thickness (CCT) and curvature in myopic patients with different genders between Mongolian and Han nationalities in the Inner Mongolia region.
METHODS: Patients with myopia, among whom 122 cases (244 eyes) were Mongolian and 150 cases (300 eyes) were Han, were selected. Pentacam was used to measure the corneal curvature, whereas CCT was determined by Pentacam, Orbscan and ultrasound pachymetry.
RESULTS: Comparisons of the curvature of men and women in Mongolia showed a significant difference (P<0.05) by comparing of the CCT values measured by three methods in Han and Mongolian in Inner Mongolia, we can draw a conclusion that the CCT values measured by Pentacam are less than the values by Orbscan and ultrasound pachymetry, and there are statistically significant difference in CCT measurement among the instruments except between the Orbscan and ultrasound pachymetry. The CCT values of Mongolians are more than Han people, and the analysis exhibited statistical significance. The CCT values measured by Orbscan in Mongolia of women are more than men, the difference showed statistical significance.
CONCLUSION: Corneal curvature in Mongolian females was significantly higher than that in males. However, no significant difference was observed among Han males and females. The CCT values of Mongolian females were higher than those of males. The normal CCT values measured by Pentacam in Mongolian myopic patients were smaller than those obtained by Orbscan or ultrasound. The normal CCT values of Mongolian patients with myopia were higher than those reported for domestic people.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Han nationality; central corneal thickness; gender; mongolian nationality; orbscan; pentacam

Year:  2015        PMID: 25938063      PMCID: PMC4413574          DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2015.02.33

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  18 in total

1.  Accuracy of Orbscan pachymetry measurements and DHG ultrasound pachymetry in primary laser in situ keratomileusis and LASIK enhancement procedures.

Authors:  N G Iskander; E Anderson Penno; N T Peters; H V Gimbel; M Ferensowicz
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  The history of LASIK.

Authors:  Dan Z Reinstein; Timothy J Archer; Marine Gobbe
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Corneal thickness measurement using Orbscan, Pentacam, Galilei, and ultrasound in normal and post-femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis eyes.

Authors:  Se-Hoon Park; Suk-Kyue Choi; Doh Lee; Eun-Jung Jun; Jin-Hyoung Kim
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.651

4.  Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using Galilei, HR Pentacam, and ultrasound.

Authors:  Hamid Reza Jahadi Hosseini; Asadollah Katbab; Mohammad Reza Khalili; Mohammad Bagher Abtahi
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.651

5.  Comparison between central corneal thickness measurements by oculus pentacam and ultrasonic pachymetry.

Authors:  Hani S Al-Mezaine; Saleh A Al-Amro; Dustan Kangave; Abdulkareem Sadaawy; Taher A Wehaib; Saleh Al-Obeidan
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  Comparison of keratometry measurements using the Pentacam HR, the Orbscan IIz, and the TMS-4 topographer.

Authors:  Zahra Tajbakhsh; Ramin Salouti; Mohammad H Nowroozzadeh; Mohammad Aghazadeh-Amiri; Seyedmehdi Tabatabaee; Mohammad Zamani
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Comparison and repeatability of keratometric and corneal power measurements obtained by Orbscan II, Pentacam, and Galilei corneal tomography systems.

Authors:  Alexandra Z Crawford; Dipika V Patel; Charles N J McGhee
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with the Galilei dual Scheimpflug analyzer and ultrasound pachymetry.

Authors:  Jeevan S Ladi; Nitant A Shah
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  Reproducibility and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement in keratoconus using the rotating Scheimpflug camera and ultrasound pachymetry.

Authors:  Ugo de Sanctis; Alessandro Missolungi; Bernardo Mutani; Lorenzo Richiardi; Federico M Grignolo
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound pachymetry, ultrasound biomicroscopy, and the Artemis-2 VHF scanner in normal eyes.

Authors:  Haya M Al-Farhan; Wafa'a Majed Al-Otaibi
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-07-06
View more
  2 in total

1.  Prevalence of and risk factors for refractive error: a cross-sectional study in Han and Mongolian adults aged 40-80 years in Inner Mongolia, China.

Authors:  M Wang; J Ma; L Pan; T Chen; H L Wang; Y H Wang; W R Wang; X D Pan; Y G Qian; X Zhang; Y Zhong; G L Shan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Corneal thickness measurements with Scheimpflug and slit scanning imaging techniques in keratoconus.

Authors:  Mohammad Aghazadeh Amiri; Hassan Hashemi; Shahroukh Ramin; Abbasali Yekta; Azadeh Taheri; Payam Nabovati; Mehdi Khabazkhoob
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.