Literature DB >> 27229002

Comparing Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions to Intracochlear Distortion Products Inferred from a Noninvasive Assay.

Glen K Martin1,2, Barden B Stagner3, Wei Dong3,4, Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin3,4.   

Abstract

The behavior of intracochlear distortion products (iDPs) was inferred by interacting a probe tone (f3) with the iDP of interest to produce a "secondary" distortion product otoacoustic emission termed DPOAE(2ry). Measures of the DPOAE(2ry) were then used to deduce the properties of the iDP. This approach was used in alert rabbits and anesthetized gerbils to compare ear-canal 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 DPOAE f2/f1 ratio functions, level/phase (L/P) maps, and interference-response areas (IRAs) to their simultaneously collected DPOAE(2ry) counterparts. These same measures were also collected in a human volunteer to demonstrate similarities with their laboratory animal counterparts and their potential applicability to humans. Results showed that DPOAEs and inferred iDPs evidenced distinct behaviors and properties. That is, DPOAE ratio functions elicited by low-level primaries peaked around an f2/f1 = 1.21 or 1.25, depending on species, while the corresponding inferred iDP ratio functions peaked at f2/f1 ratios of ~1. Additionally, L/P maps showed rapid phase variation with DPOAE frequency (fdp) for the narrow-ratio 2f1-f2 and all 2f2-f1 DPOAEs, while the corresponding DPOAE(2ry) measures evidenced relatively constant phases. Common features of narrow-ratio DPOAE IRAs, such as large enhancements for interference tones (ITs) presented above f2, were not present in DPOAE(2ry) IRAs. Finally, based on prior experiments in gerbils, the behavior of the iDP directly measured in intracochlear pressure was compared to the iDP inferred from the DPOAE(2ry) and found to be similar. Together, these findings are consistent with the notion that under certain conditions, ear-canal DPOAEs provide poor representations of iDPs and thus support a "beamforming" hypothesis. According to this concept, distributed emission components directed toward the ear canal from the f2 and basal to f2 regions can be of differing phases and thus cancel, while these same components directed toward fdp add in phase.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DPOAEs; gerbil; human; intracochlear pressure; rabbit

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27229002      PMCID: PMC4940284          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-016-0552-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  37 in total

1.  Cochlear traveling-wave amplification, suppression, and beamforming probed using noninvasive calibration of intracochlear distortion sources.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions and basilar membrane vibration in the 6-9 kHz region of sensitive chinchilla cochleae.

Authors:  William S Rhode
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Steep and shallow phase gradient distortion product otoacoustic emissions arising basal to the primary tones.

Authors:  Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Paul F Fahey; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Time-domain demonstration of distributed distortion-product otoacoustic emission components.

Authors:  Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Detection of cochlear amplification and its activation.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 6.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.

Authors:  C A Shera; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Characterizing distortion-product otoacoustic emission components across four species.

Authors:  Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; You Sun Chung; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Two-tone suppression and distortion production on the basilar membrane in the hook region of cat and guinea pig cochleae.

Authors:  W S Rhode; N P Cooper
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  A second cochlear-frequency map that correlates distortion product and neural tuning measurements.

Authors:  J B Allen; P F Fahey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Compatibility between psychophysical and physiological measurements of aural combination tones.

Authors:  J L Goldstein; G Buchsbaum; M Furst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  4 in total

1.  Estimation of Round-Trip Outer-Middle Ear Gain Using DPOAEs.

Authors:  Maryam Naghibolhosseini; Glenis R Long
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-10-28

2.  Simultaneous Intracochlear Pressure Measurements from Two Cochlear Locations: Propagation of Distortion Products in Gerbil.

Authors:  Wei Dong
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-12-01

3.  Correlations between otoacoustic emissions and performance in common psychoacoustical tasks.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Mindy M Maloney; Erin M Leshikar; Michelle H Pho
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Two-tone distortion in reticular lamina vibration of the living cochlea.

Authors:  Tianying Ren; Wenxuan He
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2020-01-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.