Literature DB >> 15957770

Two-tone distortion in intracochlear pressure.

Wei Dong1, Elizabeth S Olson.   

Abstract

Two-tone distortion was measured in the intracochlear pressure in the base of the gerbil cochlea, close to the sensory tissue, where the local motions and forces of the organ of Corti can be detected. The measurements probe both the underlying nonlinear process that generates two-tone distortion, and the filtering and spreading of the distortion products. Some of our findings are as follows: (1) The observations were consistent with previous observations of two-tone distortion in BM motion [J. Neurophysiol. 77, 2385-2399 (1997); J. Neurophysiol. 78, 261-270 (1997)]. (2) Frequency sweeps show distortion product tuning and phase-versus-frequency behavior that is similar, but not identical, to single tone tuning. (3) The decay of distortion products with distance from the basilar membrane confirms the feasibility that they could drive the stapes by a direct fluid route, as proposed by Ren [Nat. Neurosci. 7, 333-334 (2004)]. (4) The phases of the distortion products within a single family (the group of distortion products generated by a single primary pair) in some cases alternated between 0 degrees and 180 degrees when referenced to the phases of the primaries. This behavior is predicted by a simple compressive nonlinearity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15957770      PMCID: PMC3565384          DOI: 10.1121/1.1880812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  42 in total

1.  The mechanical waveform of the basilar membrane. III. Intensity effects.

Authors:  E de Boer; A L Nuttall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Intracochlear pressure measurements related to cochlear tuning.

Authors:  E S Olson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

Review 4.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.

Authors:  C A Shera; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Combination tones at frequencies greater than the primary tones.

Authors:  P M Zurek; R M Sachs
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-08-10       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Electrically evoked basilar membrane motion.

Authors:  S Xue; D C Mountain; A E Hubbard
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effects of altering organ of Corti on cochlear distortion products f2 - f1 and 2f1 - f2.

Authors:  J H Siegel; D O Kim; C E Molnar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Cochlear mechanics: nonlinear behavior in two-tone responses as reflected in cochlear-nerve-fiber responses and in ear-canal sound pressure.

Authors:  D O Kim; C E Molnar; J W Matthews
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The cochlear place-frequency map of the adult and developing Mongolian gerbil.

Authors:  M Müller
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  17 in total

1.  Reverse transmission along the ossicular chain in gerbil.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Willem F Decraemer; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-03-31

2.  An experimental study into the acousto-mechanical effects of invading the cochlea.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Nigel P Cooper
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Two-tone distortion at different longitudinal locations on the basilar membrane.

Authors:  Wenxuan He; Alfred L Nuttall; Tianying Ren
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-02-12       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Reverse wave propagation in the cochlea.

Authors:  Wenxuan He; Anders Fridberger; Edward Porsov; Karl Grosh; Tianying Ren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Source of level dependent minima in rabbit distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  P F Fahey; B B Stagner; G K Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Gerbil middle-ear sound transmission from 100 Hz to 60 kHz.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; Nigel P Cooper; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Local cochlear damage reduces local nonlinearity and decreases generator-type cochlear emissions while increasing reflector-type emissions.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  In vivo impedance of the gerbil cochlear partition at auditory frequencies.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Adaptation of Cochlear Amplification to Low Endocochlear Potential.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Elika Fallah; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Simultaneous Intracochlear Pressure Measurements from Two Cochlear Locations: Propagation of Distortion Products in Gerbil.

Authors:  Wei Dong
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.