Literature DB >> 10748323

An examination of gender differences in DPOAE phase delay measurements in normal-hearing human adults.

D M Bowman1, D K Brown, B P Kimberley.   

Abstract

This study examined gender differences in f(1)- and f(2)-sweep distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) phase delay measures in 60 normal-hearing human adults. Phase delay measures were obtained at six different f(2) frequencies ranging from 1.1 to 6.0 kHz (f(2)/f(1) ratios were 1.1-1.3). Primary levels for f(2) were 45 and 50 dB SPL (f(1)f(2)). Gender differences have been observed in normal-hearing human adults in both auditory brainstem response (ABR) and f(1)-sweep DPOAE studies. Gender differences in delay have been attributed to differences in the average length of the cochlea, where female cochleas are 13% shorter than male cochleas. Previously, the authors have proposed that the f(1)-sweep phase delay estimate is predominantly composed of a level-independent transport time to the site of DPOAE generation and a small proportion of the level and frequency-dependent filter build-up time. The f(2)-sweep delay also contains the transport time, however, it is predominantly composed of the filter build-up time. Therefore, delay differences between stimulation paradigms are equal to a proportion of the filter build-up time. In this study, mean f(1)- and f(2)-sweep delays were significantly longer in male ears than female ears at 1.1 kHz (45 and 50 dB). At 50 dB, f(1)-sweep phase delay measures were 18% longer in male ears (6.5 ms) than female ears (5.5 ms). Mean f(2)-sweep delays were 23% longer in male ears (10.0 ms) than female ears (8.1 ms). This gender difference was not observed when the isolated filter build-up time was calculated from the DPOAE phase delay difference. These observations may therefore be attributed to a gender-related anatomical difference in cochlear length.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10748323     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(99)00212-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  11 in total

1.  Gender and modulation frequency effects on auditory steady state response (ASSR) thresholds.

Authors:  Mohd Normani Zakaria; Bahram Jalaei; Nor Alaudin Abdul Wahab
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Sex differences in auditory subcortical function.

Authors:  Jennifer Krizman; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Relationships between otoacoustic emissions and a proxy measure of cochlear length derived from the auditory brainstem response.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Adrian Garcia-Sierra; Michelle D Hsieh; Mindy M Maloney; Craig A Champlin; Edward G Pasanen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Could Tailored Chirp Stimuli Benefit Measurement of the Supra-threshold Auditory Brainstem Wave-I Response?

Authors:  Jessica de Boer; Alexander Hardy; Katrin Krumbholz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-08-19

5.  Sex differences in distortion-product and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions compared.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Mindy M Maloney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Masculinization of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus): parameter optimization.

Authors:  M D Valero; E G Pasanen; D McFadden; R Ratnam
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Effect of prenatal androgens on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in male and female sheep (Ovis aries).

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Michelle D Valero; Eila K Roberts; Theresa M Lee
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 3.587

9.  Sex bias in basic and preclinical noise-induced hearing loss research.

Authors:  Amanda Marie Lauer; Katrina Marie Schrode
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.867

10.  Association Analysis of Candidate Gene Polymorphisms and Audiometric Measures of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Young Musicians.

Authors:  Ishan Sunilkumar Bhatt; Raquel Dias; Nilesh Washnik; Jin Wang; O'neil Guthrie; Michael Skelton; Jeffery Lane; Jason Wilder
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.619

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.