Literature DB >> 19272340

Masculinization of the mammalian cochlea.

Dennis McFadden1.   

Abstract

Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) differ between the sexes in humans, rhesus and marmoset monkeys, and sheep. OAEs also are different in a number of special populations of humans. Those basic findings are reviewed and discussed in the context of possible prenatal-androgen effects on the auditory system. A parsimonious explanation for several outcomes is that prenatal exposure to high levels of androgens can weaken the cochlear amplifiers and thereby weaken otoacoustic emissions (OAEs). Prenatal androgen exposure apparently also can alter auditory evoked potentials (AEPs). Some non-hormonal factors possibly capable of producing sex and group differences are discussed, and some speculations are offered about specific cochlear structures that might differ between the two sexes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19272340      PMCID: PMC2698035          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  80 in total

1.  Androgens in health and disease: an overview.

Authors:  Cynthia L Jordan; Lydia Doncarlos
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 3.587

2.  Additional findings on heritability and prenatal masculinization of cochlear mechanisms: click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  D McFadden; J C Loehlin; E G Pasanen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 3.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.

Authors:  C A Shera; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Gender differences in cochlear response time: an explanation for gender amplitude differences in the unmasked auditory brain-stem response.

Authors:  M Don; C W Ponton; J J Eggermont; A Masuda
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Development of cochlear active mechanisms in humans differs between gender.

Authors:  T Morlet; E Perrin; J D Durrant; A Lapillonne; C Ferber; R Duclaux; G Putet; L Collet
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1996-12-06       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Functional asymmetry of medial olivocochlear system in humans. Towards a peripheral auditory lateralization.

Authors:  S Khalfa; L Collet
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1996-04-10       Impact factor: 1.837

7.  Analysis of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears.

Authors:  B A Prieve; M P Gorga; A Schmidt; S Neely; J Peters; L Schultes; W Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Otoacoustic emissions in humans, birds, lizards, and frogs: evidence for multiple generation mechanisms.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; Dennis M Freeman; James C Saunders; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-05-24       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Effect of prenatal androgens on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in male and female sheep (Ovis aries).

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Michelle D Valero; Eila K Roberts; Theresa M Lee
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 3.587

10.  Incidence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in children and infants.

Authors:  E A Strickland; E M Burns; A Tubis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  20 in total

1.  What is the role of the medial olivocochlear system in speech-in-noise processing?

Authors:  Jessica de Boer; A Roger D Thornton; Katrin Krumbholz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Differences by sex, ear, and sexual orientation in the time intervals between successive peaks in auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Michelle D Hsieh; Adrian Garcia-Sierra; Craig A Champlin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Long-term stability of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Edward M Burns
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Comparing behavioral and physiological measures of combination tones: sex and race differences.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Erin M Leshikar; Michelle D Hsieh; Mindy M Maloney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Sexual orientation and the auditory system.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 8.606

6.  Peripheral auditory processing changes seasonally in Gambel's white-crowned sparrow.

Authors:  Melissa L Caras; Eliot Brenowitz; Edwin W Rubel
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Relationships between otoacoustic emissions and a proxy measure of cochlear length derived from the auditory brainstem response.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Adrian Garcia-Sierra; Michelle D Hsieh; Mindy M Maloney; Craig A Champlin; Edward G Pasanen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Steroid receptor expression in the fish inner ear varies with sex, social status, and reproductive state.

Authors:  Karen P Maruska; Russell D Fernald
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 3.288

9.  Otoacoustic emissions, auditory evoked potentials and self-reported gender in people affected by disorders of sex development (DSD).

Authors:  Amy B Wisniewski; Blas Espinoza-Varas; Christopher E Aston; Shelagh Edmundson; Craig A Champlin; Edward G Pasanen; Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.587

Review 10.  Estrogenic modulation of auditory processing: a vertebrate comparison.

Authors:  Melissa L Caras
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 8.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.