Literature DB >> 18834887

Effect of prenatal androgens on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in male and female sheep (Ovis aries).

Dennis McFadden1, Edward G Pasanen, Michelle D Valero, Eila K Roberts, Theresa M Lee.   

Abstract

Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) were measured in male and female Suffolk sheep (Ovis aries). Some sheep had been administered androgens or estrogens during prenatal development, some were gonadectomized after birth, and some were allowed to develop normally. As previously reported for spotted hyenas, gonadectomy did not alter the OAEs for either sex; accordingly, the untreated/intact and the untreated/gonadectomized animals were pooled to form the control groups. The click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs) exhibited by the female control group (N=12) were slightly stronger (effect size=0.42) than those in the male control group (N=15), which is the same direction of effect reported for humans and rhesus monkeys. Females administered testosterone prenatally (N=16) had substantially weaker (masculinized) CEOAEs than control females (effect size=1.15). Both of these outcomes are in accord with the idea that prenatal exposure to androgens weakens the cochlear mechanisms that underlie the production of OAEs. The CEOAEs of males administered testosterone prenatally (N=5) were not different from those of control males, an outcome also seen in similarly treated rhesus monkeys. Males administered dihydrotestosterone (DHT) prenatally (N=3) had slightly stronger (hypo-masculinized) CEOAEs than control males. No spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) were found in any ears, a common finding in non-human species. To our knowledge, this is the first ruminant species measured for OAEs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18834887      PMCID: PMC2649662          DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2008.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Horm Behav        ISSN: 0018-506X            Impact factor:   3.587


  54 in total

1.  An examination of gender differences in DPOAE phase delay measurements in normal-hearing human adults.

Authors:  D M Bowman; D K Brown; B P Kimberley
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Androgens in health and disease: an overview.

Authors:  Cynthia L Jordan; Lydia Doncarlos
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 3.587

3.  Additional findings on heritability and prenatal masculinization of cochlear mechanisms: click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  D McFadden; J C Loehlin; E G Pasanen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 4.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.

Authors:  C A Shera; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Individual differences and the reliability of 2F1-F2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: effects of time-of-day, stimulus variables, and gender.

Authors:  A T Cacace; W A McClelland; J Weiner; D J McFarland
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1996-12

6.  New off-line method for detecting spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in human subjects.

Authors:  C L Talmadge; G R Long; W J Murphy; A Tubis
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Longitudinal measurements of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in infants.

Authors:  E M Burns; S L Campbell; K H Arehart
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in preterm neonates: prevalence and gender effects.

Authors:  T Morlet; A Lapillonne; C Ferber; R Duclaux; L Sann; G Putet; B Salle; L Collet
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Development of cochlear active mechanisms in humans differs between gender.

Authors:  T Morlet; E Perrin; J D Durrant; A Lapillonne; C Ferber; R Duclaux; G Putet; L Collet
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1996-12-06       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  Incidence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in children and infants.

Authors:  E A Strickland; E M Burns; A Tubis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Sexual orientation and the auditory system.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 8.606

2.  Correlations between otoacoustic emissions and performance in common psychoacoustical tasks.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Mindy M Maloney; Erin M Leshikar; Michelle H Pho
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Differences in common psychoacoustical tasks by sex, menstrual cycle, and race.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Mindy M Maloney; Erin M Leshikar; Michelle H Pho
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Sex differences in hearing: Probing the role of estrogen signaling.

Authors:  Benjamin Z Shuster; Didier A Depireux; Jessica A Mong; Ronna Hertzano
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Sex differences in distortion-product and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions compared.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Mindy M Maloney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Steroid receptor expression in the fish inner ear varies with sex, social status, and reproductive state.

Authors:  Karen P Maruska; Russell D Fernald
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 3.288

Review 7.  Masculinization of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Dissociation between distortion-product and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in sheep (Ovis aries).

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Michelle D Valero; Eila K Roberts; Theresa M Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  Estrogenic modulation of auditory processing: a vertebrate comparison.

Authors:  Melissa L Caras
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 8.606

Review 10.  Sex differences in partner preferences in humans and animals.

Authors:  Jacques Balthazart
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.