Literature DB >> 35984541

Could Tailored Chirp Stimuli Benefit Measurement of the Supra-threshold Auditory Brainstem Wave-I Response?

Jessica de Boer1,2, Alexander Hardy1,3, Katrin Krumbholz4,5.   

Abstract

Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to broadband clicks are strongly affected by dyssynchrony, or "latency dispersion", of their frequency-specific cochlear contributions. Optimized chirp stimuli, designed to compensate for cochlear dispersion, can afford substantial increase in broadband ABR amplitudes, particularly for the prominent wave-V deflection. Reports on the smaller wave I, however, which may be useful for measuring cochlear synaptopathy, have been mixed. This study aimed to test previous claims that ABR latency dispersion differs between waves I and V, and between males and females, and thus that using wave- and/or sex-tailored chirps may provide more reliable wave-I benefit. Using the derived-band technique, we measured responses from frequency-restricted (one-octave-wide) cochlear regions to energy-matched click and chirp stimuli. The derived-band responses' latencies were used to assess any wave- and/or sex-related dispersion differences across bands, and their amplitudes, to evaluate any within-band dispersion differences. Our results suggest that sex-related dispersion difference within the lowest-frequency cochlear regions (< 1 kHz), where dispersion is generally greatest, may be a predominant driver of the often-reported sex difference in broadband ABR amplitude. At the same time, they showed no systematic dispersion difference between waves I and V. Instead, they suggest that reduced chirp benefit on wave I may arise as a result of chirp-induced desynchronization of on- and off-frequency responses generated at the same cochlear places, and resultant reduction in response contributions from higher-frequency cochlear regions, to which wave I is thought to be particularly sensitive.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory-evoked potentials; Cochlear dispersion; Hidden hearing loss; Objective audiology; Optimized chirp stimulus; Synaptopathy

Year:  2022        PMID: 35984541     DOI: 10.1007/s10162-022-00848-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  62 in total

1.  An examination of gender differences in DPOAE phase delay measurements in normal-hearing human adults.

Authors:  D M Bowman; D K Brown; B P Kimberley
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 2.  The search for noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy in humans: Mission impossible?

Authors:  Naomi Bramhall; Elizabeth Francis Beach; Bastian Epp; Colleen G Le Prell; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda; Christopher J Plack; Roland Schaette; Sarah Verhulst; Barbara Canlon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Head size as a basis of gender difference in the latency of the brainstem auditory-evoked response.

Authors:  M Aoyagi; Y Kim; J Yokoyama; T Kiren; Y Suzuki; Y Koike
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1990

4.  The interaction between sex and click polarity in brain-stem auditory potentials evoked from control subjects of Oriental and Caucasian origin.

Authors:  Y W Chan; E K Woo; S R Hammond; C Yiannikas; J G McLeod
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1988 Jan-Feb

5.  Interaction of click polarity, stimulus level, and repetition rate on the auditory brainstem response.

Authors:  R C Beattie
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1988

6.  Auditory brain stem responses in the cat. I. Intracranial and extracranial recordings.

Authors:  L J Achor; A Starr
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-02

7.  Non-Invasive Assays of Cochlear Synaptopathy - Candidates and Considerations.

Authors:  Hari M Bharadwaj; Alexandra R Mai; Jennifer M Simpson; Inyong Choi; Michael G Heinz; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  An alternative method for significance testing of waveform difference potentials.

Authors:  R C Blair; W Karniski
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Evaluation of waveform, latency and amplitude values of chirp ABR in newborns.

Authors:  Mario Cebulla; Hannes Lurz; Wafaa Shehata-Dieler
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 1.675

10.  Effects of skull thickness, anisotropy, and inhomogeneity on forward EEG/ERP computations using a spherical three-dimensional resistor mesh model.

Authors:  Nicolas Chauveau; Xavier Franceries; Bernard Doyon; Bernard Rigaud; Jean Pierre Morucci; Pierre Celsis
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.