Literature DB >> 18586424

Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus): parameter optimization.

M D Valero1, E G Pasanen, D McFadden, R Ratnam.   

Abstract

Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) were measured in a New World primate, the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). We determined the optimal primary-tone frequency ratio (f(2)/f(1)) to generate DPOAEs of maximal amplitude between 3 and 24 kHz. The optimal f(2)/f(1), determined by varying f(2)/f(1) from 1.02 to 1.40 using equilevel primary tones, decreased with increasing f(2) frequency between 3 and 17 kHz, and increased at 24 kHz. The optimal f(2)/f(1) ratio increased with increasing primary-tone levels from 50 to 74 dB SPL. When all stimulus parameters were considered, the mean optimal f(2)/f(1) was 1.224-1.226. Additionally, we determined the effect of reducing L(2) below L(1). Decreasing L(2) below L(1) by 0, 5, and 10 dB (f(2)/f(1)=1.21) minimally affected DPOAE strength. DPOAE levels were stronger in females than males and stronger in the right ear than the left, just as in humans. This study is the first to measure OAEs in the marmoset, and the results indicate that the effect of varying the frequency ratio and primary-tone level difference on marmoset DPOAEs is similar to the reported effects in humans and Old World primates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18586424      PMCID: PMC2567920          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  68 in total

1.  Temperature dependence of anuran distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Pim van Dijk
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-05-25

2.  Neural representations of temporally modulated signals in the auditory thalamus of awake primates.

Authors:  Edward L Bartlett; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Thalamic connections of the auditory cortex in marmoset monkeys: core and medial belt regions.

Authors:  Lisa A de la Mothe; Suzanne Blumell; Yoshinao Kajikawa; Troy A Hackett
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 3.215

4.  A power primer.

Authors:  J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Frequency dependence of acoustic distortion products in a locally active model of the cochlea.

Authors:  L J Kanis; E de Boer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Masculinized otoacoustic emissions in female spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta).

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Mary L Weldele; Stephen E Glickman; Ned J Place
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2006-05-06       Impact factor: 3.587

7.  Sex differences in otoacoustic emissions measured in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Jessica Raper; Henry S Lange; Kim Wallen
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2006-05-06       Impact factor: 3.587

8.  Plasticity of temporal pattern codes for vocalization stimuli in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Jan W H Schnupp; Thomas M Hall; Rory F Kokelaar; Bashir Ahmed
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Persistent anxiety-like behavior in marmosets following a recent predatory stress condition: reversal by diazepam.

Authors:  Marilia Barros; Marco Giorgetti; Anna América Vieira Souto; Gabriela Vilela; Katarina Santos; Naiá Vilas Boas; Carlos Tomaz
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 3.533

10.  Differential neural coding of acoustic flutter within primate auditory cortex.

Authors:  Daniel Bendor; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-04-29       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  11 in total

1.  Comparing behavioral and physiological measures of combination tones: sex and race differences.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Erin M Leshikar; Michelle D Hsieh; Mindy M Maloney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Sexual orientation and the auditory system.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 8.606

3.  The marmoset as a model of aging and age-related diseases.

Authors:  Suzette D Tardif; Keith G Mansfield; Rama Ratnam; Corinna N Ross; Toni E Ziegler
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2011

4.  Reliability of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Michelle D Valero; Rama Ratnam
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Sex differences in distortion-product and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions compared.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Mindy M Maloney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Masculinization of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Dissociation between distortion-product and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in sheep (Ovis aries).

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Michelle D Valero; Eila K Roberts; Theresa M Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra.

Authors:  Jesyin Lai; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Effect of prenatal androgens on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in male and female sheep (Ovis aries).

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Michelle D Valero; Eila K Roberts; Theresa M Lee
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 3.587

10.  Temporal bone characterization and cochlear implant feasibility in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Luke A Johnson; Charles C Della Santina; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.