Literature DB >> 25682179

Gender and modulation frequency effects on auditory steady state response (ASSR) thresholds.

Mohd Normani Zakaria1, Bahram Jalaei2, Nor Alaudin Abdul Wahab3.   

Abstract

For estimating behavioral hearing thresholds, auditory steady state response (ASSR) can be reliably evoked by stimuli at low and high modulation frequencies (MFs). In this regard, little is known regarding ASSR thresholds evoked by stimuli at different MFs in female and male participants. In fact, recent data suggest that 40-Hz ASSR is influenced by estrogen level in females. Hence, the aim of the present study was to determine the effect of gender and MF on ASSR thresholds in young adults. Twenty-eight normally hearing participants (14 males and 14 females) were enrolled in this study. For each subject, ASSR thresholds were recorded with narrow-band chirps at 500, 1,000, 2,000, and 4,000 Hz carrier frequencies (CFs) and at 40 and 90 Hz MFs. Two-way mixed ANOVA (with gender and MF as the factors) revealed no significant interaction effect between factors at all CFs (p > 0.05). The gender effect was only significant at 500 Hz CF (p < 0.05). At 500 and 1,000 Hz CFs, mean ASSR thresholds were significantly lower at 40 Hz MF than at 90 Hz MF (p < 0.05). Interestingly, at 2,000 and 4,000 Hz CFs, mean ASSR thresholds were significantly lower at 90 Hz MF than at 40 Hz MF (p < 0.05). The lower ASSR thresholds in females might be due to hormonal influence. When recording ASSR thresholds at low MF, we suggest the use of gender-specific normative data so that more valid comparisons can be made, particularly at 500 Hz CF.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory steady state response; Chirps; Estrogen; Gender; Modulation frequency

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25682179     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-015-3555-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  29 in total

1.  An examination of gender differences in DPOAE phase delay measurements in normal-hearing human adults.

Authors:  D M Bowman; D K Brown; B P Kimberley
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Comparison of MASTER and AUDERA for measurement of auditory steady-state responses.

Authors:  Heleen Luts; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Differences by sex, ear, and sexual orientation in the time intervals between successive peaks in auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Michelle D Hsieh; Adrian Garcia-Sierra; Craig A Champlin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Yu-Hsing Lin; Hsu-Chueh Ho; Hung-Pin Wu
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 1.863

5.  Head size as a basis of gender difference in the latency of the brainstem auditory-evoked response.

Authors:  M Aoyagi; Y Kim; J Yokoyama; T Kiren; Y Suzuki; Y Koike
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1990

6.  40-Hz multiple auditory steady-state responses to narrow-band chirps in sedated and anaesthetized infants.

Authors:  Roland Mühler; Torsten Rahne; Katrin Mentzel; Jesko L Verhey
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 1.675

7.  The ASSR: clinical application in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired infants and adults, comparison with the click-evoked ABR and pure-tone audiometry.

Authors:  Fanny Scherf; Jan Brokx; Floris L Wuyts; Paul H Van de Heyning
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  Fast hearing-threshold estimation using multiple auditory steady-state responses with narrow-band chirps and adaptive stimulus patterns.

Authors:  Roland Mühler; Katrin Mentzel; Jesko Verhey
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-04-24

9.  Clinical comparison of the auditory steady-state response with the click auditory brainstem response in infants.

Authors:  Hyo Sook Lee; Joong Ho Ahn; Jong Woo Chung; Tae Hyun Yoon; Kwang-Sun Lee
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-12-26       Impact factor: 3.372

10.  Comparative study between pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in normal hearing subjects.

Authors:  Roberto Miquelino de Oliveira Beck; Bernardo Faria Ramos; Signe Schuster Grasel; Henrique Faria Ramos; Maria Flávia Bonadia B de Moraes; Edigar Rezende de Almeida; Ricardo Ferreira Bento
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb
View more
  4 in total

1.  Effects of degree and symmetricity of bilateral spectral smearing, carrier frequency, and subject sex on amplitude of evoked auditory steady-state response signal.

Authors:  Jong Ho Hwang; Kyoung Won Nam; Dong Pyo Jang; In Young Kim
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 5.082

2.  Cortical volume and 40-Hz auditory-steady-state responses in patients with schizophrenia and healthy controls.

Authors:  Sungkean Kim; Seon-Kyeong Jang; Do-Won Kim; Miseon Shim; Yong-Wook Kim; Chang-Hwan Im; Seung-Hwan Lee
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 4.881

3.  Electrocochleographic recording in Asian adults: Preliminary normative data and demographic analyses.

Authors:  Mohd Normani Zakaria; Nik Adilah Nik Othman; Zalilah Musa
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2017-02-11

4.  Mode of recording and modulation frequency effects of auditory steady state response thresholds.

Authors:  Bahram Jalaei; Moslem Shaabani; Mohd Normani Zakaria
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.