Literature DB >> 21855407

Sex differences in auditory subcortical function.

Jennifer Krizman1, Erika Skoe, Nina Kraus.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Sex differences have been demonstrated in the peripheral auditory system as well as in higher-level cognitive processing. Here, we aimed to determine if the subcortical response to a complex auditory stimulus is encoded differently between the sexes.
METHODS: Using electrophysiological techniques, we assessed the auditory brainstem response to a synthesized stop-consonant speech syllable [da] in 76 native-English speaking, young adults (38 female). Timing and frequency components of the response were compared between males and females to determine which aspects of the response are affected by sex.
RESULTS: A dissimilarity between males and females was seen in the neural response to the components of the speech stimulus that change rapidly over time; but not in the slower changing, lower frequency information in the stimulus. We demonstrate that, in agreement with the click-evoked brainstem response, females have earlier peaks relative to males in the subcomponents of the response representing the onset of the speech sound. In contrast, the response peaks comprising the frequency-following response, which encode the fundamental frequency (F(0)) of the stimulus, as well as the spectral amplitude of the response to the F(0), is not affected by sex. Notably, the higher-frequency elements of the speech syllable are encoded differently between males and females, with females having greater representation of spectrotemporal information for frequencies above the F(0).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide a baseline for interpreting the higher incidence of language impairment (e.g. dyslexia, autism, specific language impairment) in males, and the subcortical deficits associated with these disorders. SIGNIFICANCE: These results parallel the subcortical encoding patterns that are documented for good and poor readers in that poor readers differ from good readers on encoding fast but not slow components of speech. This parallel may thus help to explain the higher incidence of reading impairment in males compared to females.
Copyright © 2011 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21855407      PMCID: PMC3226913          DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.07.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  122 in total

1.  Right-hemisphere auditory cortex is dominant for coding syllable patterns in speech.

Authors:  Daniel A Abrams; Trent Nicol; Steven Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Additional findings on heritability and prenatal masculinization of cochlear mechanisms: click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  D McFadden; J C Loehlin; E G Pasanen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Handedness and sex differences in hemispheric asymmetry.

Authors:  D A Lake; M P Bryden
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Gender differences in cochlear response time: an explanation for gender amplitude differences in the unmasked auditory brain-stem response.

Authors:  M Don; C W Ponton; J J Eggermont; A Masuda
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Error analysis on the California Consonant Test by manner of articulation.

Authors:  T H Townsend; D M Schwartz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1981 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Auditory temporal coding in dyslexia.

Authors:  K I McAnally; J F Stein
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1996-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Atypical brainstem representation of onset and formant structure of speech sounds in children with language-based learning problems.

Authors:  Brad Wible; Trent Nicol; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.251

8.  Auditory neurophysiologic responses and discrimination deficits in children with learning problems.

Authors:  N Kraus; T J McGee; T D Carrell; S G Zecker; T G Nicol; D B Koch
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-08-16       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Functional lateralization for auditory temporal processing in male and female rats.

Authors:  R H Fitch; C P Brown; K O'Connor; P Tallal
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 1.912

10.  Brain-stem auditory evoked potentials in the rat: effects of gender, stimulus characteristics and ethanol sedation.

Authors:  M W Church; H L Williams; J A Holloway
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-07
View more
  38 in total

1.  A comparison of spectral magnitude and phase-locking value analyses of the frequency-following response to complex tones.

Authors:  Li Zhu; Hari Bharadwaj; Jing Xia; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Age-related changes of auditory brainstem responses in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Chi-Wing Ng; Xochi Navarro; James R Engle; Gregg H Recanzone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Music training alters the course of adolescent auditory development.

Authors:  Adam T Tierney; Jennifer Krizman; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Hidden Markov modeling of frequency-following responses to Mandarin lexical tones.

Authors:  Fernando Llanos; Zilong Xie; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Age-related changes in the relationship between auditory brainstem responses and envelope-following responses.

Authors:  Aravindakshan Parthasarathy; Jyotishka Datta; Julie Ann Luna Torres; Charneka Hopkins; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-05-21

6.  The Investigation of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Responses in Young Adults Having Musical Education.

Authors:  Hanna Garnier; Jakub Wisniewski; Przemyslaw Waszak
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 2.021

7.  Are speech-evoked auditory brainstem response (speech-ABR) outcomes influenced by ethnicity?

Authors:  Mohd Normani Zakaria; Bahram Jalaei; Cheu Lih Aw; Dinsuhaimi Sidek
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 3.307

8.  Bilingualism increases neural response consistency and attentional control: evidence for sensory and cognitive coupling.

Authors:  Jennifer Krizman; Erika Skoe; Viorica Marian; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  GDNF and BDNF gene interplay in chronic tinnitus.

Authors:  Sand Pg; Langguth B; Schecklmann M; Kleinjung T
Journal:  Int J Mol Epidemiol Genet       Date:  2012-08-31

10.  Stability and plasticity of auditory brainstem function across the lifespan.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Jennifer Krizman; Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.