Literature DB >> 15735935

Detailed f1, f2 area study of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the frog.

Sebastiaan W F Meenderink1, Peter M Narins, Pim van Dijk.   

Abstract

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) are weak sounds emitted from the ear when it is stimulated with two tones. They are a manifestation of the nonlinear mechanics of the inner ear. As such, they provide a noninvasive tool for the study of the inner ear mechanics involved in the transduction of sound into nerve fiber activity. Based on the DPOAE phase behavior as a function of frequency, it is currently believed that mammalian DPOAEs are the combination of two components, each generated by a different mechanism located at a different location in the cochlea. In frogs, instead of a cochlea, two separate hearing papillae are present. Of these, the basilar papilla (BP) is a relatively simple structure that essentially functions as a single auditory filter. A two-mechanism model of DPOAE generation is not expected to apply to the BP. In contrast, the other hearing organ, the amphibian papilla (AP), exhibits a tonotopic organization. In the past it has been suggested that this papilla supports a traveling wave in its tectorial membrane. Therefore, a two-mechanism model of DPOAE generation may be applicable for DPOAEs from the AP. In the present study we report on the amplitude and phase of DPOAEs in the frog ear in a detailed f1, f2 area study. The result is markedly different from that in the mammalian cochlea. It indicates that DPOAEs generated by neither papilla agree with the two-mechanism traveling wave model. This confirms our expectation for the BP and does not support the hypothesized presence of a mechanical traveling wave in the AP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15735935      PMCID: PMC2504638          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-004-5019-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  22 in total

1.  Basic properties of auditory-nerve responses from a "simple' ear: the basilar papilla of the frog.

Authors:  D A Ronken
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Two sources of acoustic distortion products from the human cochlea.

Authors:  A M Brown; F P Harris; H A Beveridge
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Auditory peripheral tuning: evidence for a simple resonance phenomenon in the lizard Tiliqua.

Authors:  G A Manley; G K Yates; C Köppl
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Ultrastructure of the basilar papilla, an auditory organ in the bullfrog.

Authors:  L S Frishkopf; A Flock
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 1.494

5.  Latency and multiple sources of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  L J Stover; S T Neely; M P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Morphological basis for tonotopy in the anuran amphibian papilla.

Authors:  E R Lewis; E L Leverenz
Journal:  Scan Electron Microsc       Date:  1983

7.  Neurophysiological evidence for a traveling wave in the amphibian inner ear.

Authors:  C M Hillery; P M Narins
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-09-07       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Frequency and time domain comparison of low-frequency auditory fiber responses in two anuran amphibians.

Authors:  C M Hillery; P M Narins
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  On the frog amphibian papilla.

Authors:  E R Lewis
Journal:  Scan Electron Microsc       Date:  1984

10.  Anatomical distribution of efferent fibers in the 8th cranial nerve of the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana).

Authors:  R G Robbins; R S Bauknight; V Honrubia
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1967 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.494

View more
  5 in total

1.  Local cochlear damage reduces local nonlinearity and decreases generator-type cochlear emissions while increasing reflector-type emissions.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Mechanics of the frog ear.

Authors:  Pim Van Dijk; Matthew J Mason; Richard L M Schoffelen; Peter M Narins; Sebastiaan W F Meenderink
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Frequency matching of vocalizations to inner-ear sensitivity along an altitudinal gradient in the coqui frog.

Authors:  Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Mirja Kits; Peter M Narins
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Otoacoustic emissions in humans, birds, lizards, and frogs: evidence for multiple generation mechanisms.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; Dennis M Freeman; James C Saunders; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-05-24       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Tuning of the tectorial membrane in the basilar papilla of the northern leopard frog.

Authors:  R L M Schoffelen; J M Segenhout; P van Dijk
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-06-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.