Literature DB >> 12576609

Repeat chlamydia screening by mail, San Francisco.

P J Bloomfield1, K C Steiner, C K Kent, J D Klausner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility and acceptability of home screening for repeat chlamydial infection using urine test kits sent through the mail.
METHODS: A letter offering home rescreening was mailed to 399 adults who previously tested positive for chlamydia. Kits were then mailed to anyone who did not actively decline. The home testing kits contained instructions on how to collect a urine specimen and return the specimen by mail. Specimens were tested with strand displacement amplification. A short survey asked individuals their level of concern about confidentiality, safety, and privacy of mail screening.
RESULTS: Among the 313 potential test kit recipients, 22.4% responded. Response rates were highest among homosexual and bisexual men (38.6%), people 35 years or older (34.3%), and white people (34.6%). The overall positivity rate was 3.2% (2/63). In women 18-25 years old, the positivity was 13.3% (2/15).
CONCLUSIONS: Home testing with mailed urine collection kits is feasible and an acceptable method to screen for recurrent chlamydial infection. Young women would probably benefit most because of their higher rates of reinfection and risk for sequelae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12576609      PMCID: PMC1744608          DOI: 10.1136/sti.79.1.28

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Infect        ISSN: 1368-4973            Impact factor:   3.519


  9 in total

1.  Social and behavioral correlates of pelvic inflammatory disease.

Authors:  S O Aral; J N Wasserheit
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.830

2.  Recurrent chlamydial infections increase the risks of hospitalization for ectopic pregnancy and pelvic inflammatory disease.

Authors:  S D Hillis; L M Owens; P A Marchbanks; L F Amsterdam; W R Mac Kenzie
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Determinants of persistent and recurrent Chlamydia trachomatis infection in young women: results of a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  W L Whittington; C Kent; P Kissinger; M K Oh; J D Fortenberry; S E Hillis; B Litchfield; G A Bolan; M E St Louis; T A Farley; H H Handsfield
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  Impact of menstrual cycle on the diagnostic performance of LCR, TMA, and PCE for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in home obtained and mailed vaginal flush and urine samples.

Authors:  J K Møller; B Andersen; F Olesen; T Lignell; L Ostergaard
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.519

5.  Postal urine specimens: are they a feasible method for genital chlamydial infection screening?

Authors:  J Macleod; R Rowsell; P Horner; T Crowley; E O Caul; N Low; G D Smith
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Incidence and repeat infection rates of Chlamydia trachomatis among male and female patients in an STD clinic: implications for screening and rescreening.

Authors:  Cornelis A Rietmeijer; Rogier Van Bemmelen; Franklyn N Judson; John M Douglas
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.830

7.  Home screening for chlamydial genital infection: is it acceptable to young men and women?

Authors:  J Stephenson; C Carder; A Copas; A Robinson; G Ridgway; A Haines
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.519

8.  Recurrence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection evaluated by mailed samples obtained at home: 24 weeks' prospective follow up study.

Authors:  H O Kjaer; G Dimcevski; G Hoff; F Olesen; L Ostergaard
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.519

9.  Diagnosis of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women based on mailed samples obtained at home: multipractice comparative study.

Authors:  L Ostergaard; J K Møller; B Andersen; F Olesen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-11-09
  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  Monitoring STI prevalence using telephone surveys and mailed urine specimens: a pilot test.

Authors:  E Eggleston; C F Turner; S M Rogers; A Roman; W C Miller; M A Villarroel; L Ganapathi
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.519

2.  New strategies for biosample collection in population-based social research.

Authors:  Heather H Gatny; Mick P Couper; William G Axinn
Journal:  Soc Sci Res       Date:  2013-03-22

3.  Home screening for sexually transmitted diseases in high-risk young women: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Robert L Cook; Lars Østergaard; Sharon L Hillier; Pamela J Murray; Chung-Chou H Chang; Diane M Comer; Roberta B Ness
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 3.519

Review 4.  Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Disease Screening Outside the Clinic--Implications for the Modern Sexually Transmitted Disease Program.

Authors:  Kyle T Bernstein; Joan M Chow; Preeti Pathela; Thomas L Gift
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.830

5.  Rationale and design of REACT: a randomised controlled trial assessing the effectiveness of home-collection to increase chlamydia retesting and detect repeat positive tests.

Authors:  Kirsty S Smith; Jane S Hocking; Marcus Chen; Christopher K Fairley; Anna McNulty; Phillip Read; Catriona S Bradshaw; Sepehr N Tabrizi; Handan Wand; Marion Saville; William Rawlinson; Suzanne M Garland; Basil Donovan; John M Kaldor; Rebecca Guy
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 6.  Obtaining self-samples to diagnose curable sexually transmitted infections: a systematic review of patients' experiences.

Authors:  Priyamvada Paudyal; Carrie Llewellyn; Jason Lau; Mohammad Mahmud; Helen Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.