R W Peeling1, B Toye, P Jessamine, I Gemmill. 1. National Laboratory for Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Laboratory Centre for Disease Control, Health Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate pooling of first catch urine (FCU) specimens as a cost effective strategy for chlamydia testing. METHODS: Mock specimens were pooled with and without dilution to determine optimal pool size and ease of work flow. The performance of the Amplicor Chlamydia trachomatis PCR assay on pooled specimens was compared with individual testing using 370 FCU specimens from asymptomatic men presenting to an STD clinic. Cost savings associated with pooling were estimated. RESULTS: Using mock specimens, the sensitivity and specificity of the Amplicor PCR assay were not affected by pool sizes of two and five, but at a pool size of 10 decreased sensitivity due to inhibition was observed in one of five mock pools when the pooling method which involved no dilution was used. Archived FCU specimens from a study of 370 asymptomatic men were combined consecutively into 74 pools of five and tested by PCR. Of the 18 pools that contained positive specimens, 17 were PCR positive. Compared with testing FCU specimens individually, pooling resulted in a sensitivity of 95%, specificity of 100%, and a cost savings of 57% based on reduced number of tests required. CONCLUSION: Depending on the prevalence of infection, pooling of FCU specimens for PCR testing may result in cost savings compared with testing specimens individually. Further evaluations to validate this strategy using fresh FCU specimens are needed.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate pooling of first catch urine (FCU) specimens as a cost effective strategy for chlamydia testing. METHODS: Mock specimens were pooled with and without dilution to determine optimal pool size and ease of work flow. The performance of the Amplicor Chlamydia trachomatis PCR assay on pooled specimens was compared with individual testing using 370 FCU specimens from asymptomatic men presenting to an STD clinic. Cost savings associated with pooling were estimated. RESULTS: Using mock specimens, the sensitivity and specificity of the Amplicor PCR assay were not affected by pool sizes of two and five, but at a pool size of 10 decreased sensitivity due to inhibition was observed in one of five mock pools when the pooling method which involved no dilution was used. Archived FCU specimens from a study of 370 asymptomatic men were combined consecutively into 74 pools of five and tested by PCR. Of the 18 pools that contained positive specimens, 17 were PCR positive. Compared with testing FCU specimens individually, pooling resulted in a sensitivity of 95%, specificity of 100%, and a cost savings of 57% based on reduced number of tests required. CONCLUSION: Depending on the prevalence of infection, pooling of FCU specimens for PCR testing may result in cost savings compared with testing specimens individually. Further evaluations to validate this strategy using fresh FCU specimens are needed.
Authors: R P Verkooyen; A Luijendijk; W M Huisman; W H Goessens; J A Kluytmans; J H van Rijsoort-Vos; H A Verbrugh Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1996-12 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: F A Plummer; J N Simonsen; D W Cameron; J O Ndinya-Achola; J K Kreiss; M N Gakinya; P Waiyaki; M Cheang; P Piot; A R Ronald Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 1991-02 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: J S Lin; W E Jones; L Yan; K A Wirthwein; E E Flaherty; R M Haivanis; P A Rice Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 1992 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: S A Morré; C J Meijer; C Munk; S Krüger-Kjaer; J F Winther; H O Jørgensens; A J van Den Brule Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: J Kapala; D Copes; A Sproston; J Patel; D Jang; A Petrich; J Mahony; K Biers; M Chernesky Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Duygu Durukan; Tim R H Read; Catriona S Bradshaw; Christopher K Fairley; Deborah A Williamson; Vesna De Petra; Kate Maddaford; Rebecca Wigan; Marcus Y Chen; Anne Tran; Eric P F Chow Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2020-04-23 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: M L Plummer; D A Ross; D Wight; J Changalucha; G Mshana; J Wamoyi; J Todd; A Anemona; F F Mosha; A I N Obasi; R J Hayes Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Takele Lakew; Wondu Alemayehu; Muluken Melese; Elizabeth Yi; Jenafir I House; Kevin C Hong; Zhaoxia Zhou; Kathryn J Ray; Travis C Porco; Bruce D Gaynor; Thomas M Lietman; Jeremy D Keenan Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2009-08-25
Authors: Kathryn J Ray; Thomas M Lietman; Travis C Porco; Jeremy D Keenan; Robin L Bailey; Anthony W Solomon; Matthew J Burton; Emma Harding-Esch; Martin J Holland; David Mabey Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2009-06-16