Literature DB >> 7852556

Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in men and women by testing first-void urine by ligase chain reaction.

M A Chernesky1, D Jang, H Lee, J D Burczak, H Hu, J Sellors, S J Tomazic-Allen, J B Mahony.   

Abstract

From April to September 1993, 305 men and 447 women in Hamilton, Canada, consented to the collection of a urethral or cervical swab, respectively, for culture and 20 ml of first-void urine (FVU) for testing by the enzyme immunoassay Chlamydiazyme and by ligase chain reaction (LCR) in the form of a kit from Abbott Laboratories called LCx Chlamydia trachomatis. Evaluation of test performance with each specimen was calculated on the basis of an expanded "gold standard" of a patient found to be positive by culture or by a confirmed nonculture test. By using this expanded standard, the prevalence of infection was determined to be 6% (27/447) for the women and 18.4% (56/305) for the men. LCR testing of FVU in both studies was the most sensitive approach (96%). The performance of Chlamydiazyme was as follows: cervical swab, 78.3% sensitivity; female FVU, 37% sensitivity; and male FVU, 67.9% sensitivity. Culture was the least sensitive approach to diagnosis: female cervix, 55.6%; and male urethra, 37.5%. LCR testing of FVU from men or women diagnosed the greatest number of genitourinary tract infections with no false positives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7852556      PMCID: PMC264142          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.32.11.2682-2685.1994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  35 in total

1.  Confirmatory polymerase chain reaction testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine from asymptomatic and symptomatic men.

Authors:  J B Mahony; K E Luinstra; J W Sellors; D Jang; M A Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of three Chlamydia trachomatis immunoassays with an unbiased, noninvasive clinical sample.

Authors:  I D Paul; E O Caul
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Non-invasive sampling method for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  E O Caul; I D Paul; J D Milne; T Crowley
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-11-26       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigens in urine as an alternative to swabs and cultures.

Authors:  M Chernesky; S Castriciano; J Sellors; I Stewart; I Cunningham; S Landis; W Seidelman; L Grant; C Devlin; J Mahony
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Chlamydia trachomatis in cervicitis and urethritis in women.

Authors:  J Paavonen; E Vesterinen
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis Suppl       Date:  1982

6.  Chlamydial infections of the urethra in women.

Authors:  M G Bradley; D Hobson; N Lee; I A Tait; E Rees
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1985-12

7.  Chlamydia trachomatis urethral infections in men. Prevalence, risk factors, and clinical manifestations.

Authors:  W E Stamm; L A Koutsky; J K Benedetti; J L Jourden; R C Brunham; K K Holmes
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 8.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genitourinary infections.

Authors:  W E Stamm
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Chlamydia trachomatis-induced urethritis in female partners of men with nongonococcal urethritis.

Authors:  J Paavonen
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1979 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  Diagnosing Chlamydia trachomatis urethritis by first-catch urine enzyme immunoassay in adolescent males.

Authors:  A G Getts
Journal:  J Adolesc Health Care       Date:  1989-05
View more
  71 in total

1.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis endocervical infections by ligase chain reaction versus ACCESS Chlamydia antigen assay.

Authors:  K B Waites; K R Smith; M A Crum; R D Hockett; A H Wells; E W Hook
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of the NucliSens Basic Kit for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in genital tract specimens using nucleic acid sequence-based amplification of 16S rRNA.

Authors:  J B Mahony; X Song; S Chong; M Faught; T Salonga; J Kapala
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Pooling cervical swabs and testing by ligase chain reaction are accurate and cost-saving strategies for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  J Kapala; D Copes; A Sproston; J Patel; D Jang; A Petrich; J Mahony; K Biers; M Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Surveys on sexual health: recent developments and future directions.

Authors:  K Wellings; J Cleland
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.519

5.  Chlamydia trachomatis diagnostics.

Authors:  M A Chernesky
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.519

6.  Performance of the MagNA pure LC robot for extraction of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae DNA from urine and swab specimens.

Authors:  Nicholas Dalesio; Vince Marsiglia; Andrew Quinn; Thomas C Quinn; Charlotte A Gaydos
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of the ligase chain reaction with cell culture for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women.

Authors:  G L Ridgway; G Mumtaz; A J Robinson; M Franchini; C Carder; J Burczak; H Lee
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Comparison of three commercially available amplification assays, AMP CT, LCx, and COBAS AMPLICOR, for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine.

Authors:  W H Goessens; J W Mouton; W I van der Meijden; S Deelen; T H van Rijsoort-Vos; N Lemmens-den Toom; H A Verbrugh; R P Verkooyen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Follow-up, treatment, and reinfection rates among asymptomatic chlamydia trachomatis cases in general practice.

Authors:  Irene G M van Valkengoed; Servaas A Morré; Adriaan J C van den Brule; Chris J L M Meijer; Lex M Bouter; Jacques Th M van Eijk; A Joan P Boeke
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Comparison of performances of two commercially available tests, a PCR assay and a ligase chain reaction test, in detection of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection.

Authors:  M Puolakkainen; E Hiltunen-Back; T Reunala; S Suhonen; P Lähteenmäki; M Lehtinen; J Paavonen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.