Literature DB >> 11714938

Effectiveness of a mass media campaign to recruit young adults for testing of Chlamydia trachomatis by use of home obtained and mailed samples.

B Andersen1, L Østergaard, J K Møller, F Olesen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a structured information campaign aiming to recruit young adults for a Chlamydia trachomatis test by use of a non-invasive, home obtained and mailed sample.
METHODS: All individuals aged 21-23 living in Aarhus county, Denmark (30 000 young adults) were offered a mailed home sampling test for C trachomatis as part of a structured 14 week information campaign on chlamydia. The kit for home sampling could be requested by leaving a message on an answering machine or through a website on the internet.
RESULTS: During the campaign 119 of 15 000 women (0.8%) and 64 of 15 000 men (0.4%) were tested. Prevalence of infection was 8.4% (10/119) and 7.8% (5/64) in females and males, respectively. Four infections in women (4/10=40%) and three infections in men (3/5=60%) were asymptomatic.
CONCLUSIONS: The mass media campaign had only a limited effect, and there is a need for more effective outreach programmes to recruit young asymptomatic individuals for C trachomatis testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11714938      PMCID: PMC1744403          DOI: 10.1136/sti.77.6.416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Infect        ISSN: 1368-4973            Impact factor:   3.519


  11 in total

1.  Efficacy of home sampling for screening of Chlamydia trachomatis: randomised study.

Authors:  L Ostergaard; B Andersen; F Olesen; J K Moller
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-07-04

Review 2.  Global epidemiology of sexually transmitted diseases.

Authors:  A C Gerbase; J T Rowley; T E Mertens
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Home sampling versus conventional contact tracing for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis infection in male partners of infected women: randomised study.

Authors:  B Andersen; L Ostergaard; J K Møller; F Olesen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-01-31

Review 4.  A review of cervical cancer screening intervention research: implications for public health programs and future research.

Authors:  A C Marcus; L A Crane
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Impact of menstrual cycle on the diagnostic performance of LCR, TMA, and PCE for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in home obtained and mailed vaginal flush and urine samples.

Authors:  J K Møller; B Andersen; F Olesen; T Lignell; L Ostergaard
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.519

6.  [Knowledge, attitude and behavior among patients with Chlamydia. Perspectives for prevention].

Authors:  J R Fouchard; A M Worm
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  1997-08-18

7.  Chlamydia trachomatis infections in female military recruits.

Authors:  C A Gaydos; M R Howell; B Pare; K L Clark; D A Ellis; R M Hendrix; J C Gaydos; K T McKee; T C Quinn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-09-10       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Home sampling versus conventional swab sampling for screening of Chlamydia trachomatis in women: a cluster-randomized 1-year follow-up study.

Authors:  L Ostergaard; B Andersen; J K Møller; F Olesen
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2000-10-25       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Diagnosis of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women based on mailed samples obtained at home: multipractice comparative study.

Authors:  L Ostergaard; J K Møller; B Andersen; F Olesen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-11-09

10.  Feasibility and yield of screening urine for Chlamydia trachomatis by polymerase chain reaction among high-risk male youth in field-based and other nonclinic settings. A new strategy for sexually transmitted disease control.

Authors:  C A Rietmeijer; K J Yamaguchi; C G Ortiz; S A Montstream; T LeRoux; J M Ehret; F N Judson; J M Douglas
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.830

View more
  9 in total

1.  Barriers to effective STI screening in a post-Soviet society: results from a qualitative study.

Authors:  A Uusküla; K Kangur; L A McNutt
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.519

2.  Simplifying chlamydia testing: an innovative Chlamydia trachomatis testing approach using the internet and a home sampling strategy: population based study.

Authors:  D P Novak; R B Karlsson
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.519

3.  A randomized trial of home versus clinic-based sexually transmitted disease screening among men.

Authors:  Mary M Reagan; Hanna Xu; Shirley L Shih; Gina M Secura; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  From the NIH: proceedings of a workshop on the importance of self-obtained vaginal specimens for detection of sexually transmitted infections.

Authors:  Marcia M Hobbs; Barbara van der Pol; Patricia Totten; Charlotte A Gaydos; Anna Wald; Terri Warren; Rachel L Winer; Robert L Cook; Carolyn D Deal; M Elizabeth Rogers; Julius Schachter; King K Holmes; David H Martin
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.830

5.  Home-based chlamydia testing of young people attending a music festival--who will pee and post?

Authors:  Rachel Sacks-Davis; Judy Gold; Campbell K Aitken; Margaret E Hellard
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Comparison of sampling methods for hard-to-reach francophone populations: yield and adequacy of advertisement and respondent-driven sampling.

Authors:  Emmanuel Ngwakongnwi; Kathryn M King-Shier; Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Richard Musto; Hude Quan
Journal:  Open Med       Date:  2014-10-14

Review 7.  Direct Access for Patients to Diagnostic Testing and Results Using eHealth: Systematic Review on eHealth and Diagnostics.

Authors:  Anke Versluis; Kyma Schnoor; Niels H Chavannes; Esther Pwa Talboom-Kamp
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Promoting chlamydia screening with posters and leaflets in general practice--a qualitative study.

Authors:  Elaine Freeman; Rebecca Howell-Jones; Isabel Oliver; Sarah Randall; William Ford-Young; Philippa Beckwith; Cliodna McNulty
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Do sexual health campaigns work? An outcome evaluation of a media campaign to increase chlamydia testing among young people aged 15-24 in England.

Authors:  Maya Gobin; Neville Verlander; Carla Maurici; Angie Bone; Anthony Nardone
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 3.295

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.