Literature DB >> 9405941

False-negative results of a ligase chain reaction assay to detect Chlamydia trachomatis due to inhibitors in urine.

E S Berg1, G Anestad, H Moi, G Størvold, K Skaug.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the presence of inhibitors in urine specimens causing false-negative results in a commercial Chlamydia trachomatis gap-filling ligase chain reaction (Gap-LCR) assay. On testing of urine samples by the Gap-LCR assay and urethral swab specimens by cell culture, 73 (19%) Chlamydia trachomatis positive subjects were detected among 382 men attending a clinic for sexually transmitted diseases. In 56 subjects, the agent was detected in both the urine and the urethral samples, while 309 subjects were negative in both tests. In seven subjects urine samples were Gap-LCR positive (confirmed by a different Gap-LCR assay), but the corresponding urethral swab samples were cell culture-negative. In another ten subjects the urethral swab samples were cell culture positive, but their urine samples were Gap-LCR negative. Subsequent re-analysis of the urine samples including the addition of external Chlamydia trachomatis DNA indicated full or partial inhibition in nine of the cell culture-positive Gap-LCR negative subjects. When urine preparations were freeze-thawed and diluted prior to testing, Chlamydia trachomatis was detected in six of the ten initially Gap-LCR-negative samples. Gap-LCR inhibitors were present in at least nine (12%) of the 73 urine preparations from the Chlamydia trachomatis positive individuals. Identification of samples containing Gap-LCR inhibitors and subsequent processing to reduce the inhibition increased the sensitivity of the test from 86% to 95%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9405941     DOI: 10.1007/bf01709252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  16 in total

1.  Confirmatory polymerase chain reaction testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine from asymptomatic and symptomatic men.

Authors:  J B Mahony; K E Luinstra; J W Sellors; D Jang; M A Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Screening urine samples by leukocyte esterase test and ligase chain reaction for chlamydial infections among asymptomatic men.

Authors:  G Anestad; B P Berdal; O Scheel; R Mundal; O Odinsen; K Skaug; O S Khalil; P Plier; H Lee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of manual Amplicor PCR, Cobas Amplicor PCR, and LCx assays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women by using urine specimens.

Authors:  R Pasternack; P Vuorinen; T Pitkäjärvi; M Koskela; A Miettinen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  The 7.5-kb plasmid present in Chlamydia trachomatis is not essential for the growth of this microorganism.

Authors:  E M Peterson; B A Markoff; J Schachter; L M de la Maza
Journal:  Plasmid       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.466

5.  Use of polymerase chain reaction and rabbit infectivity testing to detect Treponema pallidum in amniotic fluid, fetal and neonatal sera, and cerebrospinal fluid.

Authors:  E Grimprel; P J Sanchez; G D Wendel; J M Burstain; G H McCracken; J D Radolf; M V Norgard
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Amplification of Chlamydia trachomatis DNA by ligase chain reaction.

Authors:  B J Dille; C C Butzen; L G Birkenmeyer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens by polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  M J Loeffelholz; C A Lewinski; S R Silver; A P Purohit; S A Herman; D A Buonagurio; E A Dragon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genitourinary infection in women by ligase chain reaction assay of urine.

Authors:  H H Lee; M A Chernesky; J Schachter; J D Burczak; W W Andrews; S Muldoon; G Leckie; W E Stamm
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-01-28       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Inhibition of PCR by aqueous and vitreous fluids.

Authors:  D L Wiedbrauk; J C Werner; A M Drevon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Specific amplification of a DNA sequence common to all Chlamydia trachomatis serovars using the polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  B Dutilh; C Bébéar; P Rodriguez; A Vekris; J Bonnet; M Garret
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.992

View more
  15 in total

1.  Reproducibility problems with the Abbott laboratories LCx assay for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  A M Gronowski; S Copper; D Baorto; P R Murray
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  The Use of Molecular Techniques for the Diagnosis and Epidemiologic Study of Sexually Transmitted Infections.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.725

3.  Effect of urine specimen dilution on the performance of two commercial systems in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in men.

Authors:  R Pasternack; P Vuorinen; A Miettinen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Impact of menstrual cycle on the diagnostic performance of LCR, TMA, and PCE for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in home obtained and mailed vaginal flush and urine samples.

Authors:  J K Møller; B Andersen; F Olesen; T Lignell; L Ostergaard
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.519

5.  Application of Alternative Nucleic Acid Extraction Protocols to ProGastro SSCS Assay for Detection of Bacterial Enteric Pathogens.

Authors:  Erik Munson; Maureen Napierala; Kimber L Munson; Dorothy Bilbo; Michael A Schulte
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Characterization of Chlamydia trachomatis omp1 genotypes among sexually transmitted disease patients in Sweden.

Authors:  M Jurstrand; L Falk; H Fredlund; M Lindberg; P Olcén; S Andersson; K Persson; J Albert; A Bäckman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  External quality assessment for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  V J Chalker; H Vaughan; P Patel; A Rossouw; H Seyedzadeh; K Gerrard; V L A James
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Reliability of nucleic acid amplification methods for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine: results of the first international collaborative quality control study among 96 laboratories.

Authors:  Roel P Verkooyen; Gerda T Noordhoek; Paul E Klapper; Jim Reid; Jurjen Schirm; Graham M Cleator; Margareta Ieven; Gunnar Hoddevik
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  External quality assessment program for Chlamydia trachomatis diagnostic testing by nucleic acid amplification assays.

Authors:  Sally Land; Sepehr Tabrizi; Anthony Gust; Elizabeth Johnson; Susan Garland; Elizabeth M Dax
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Urine specimens from pregnant and nonpregnant women inhibitory to amplification of Chlamydia trachomatis nucleic acid by PCR, ligase chain reaction, and transcription-mediated amplification: identification of urinary substances associated with inhibition and removal of inhibitory activity.

Authors:  J Mahony; S Chong; D Jang; K Luinstra; M Faught; D Dalby; J Sellors; M Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.