Literature DB >> 8774575

The discrepancy in discrepant analysis.

A Hadgu1.   

Abstract

Discrepant analysis is a widely used technique that attempts to provide estimates of sensitivity and specificity in the presence of an imperfect gold-standard. This technique has been applied by many researchers to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of DNA-amplification tests for Chlamydia trachomatis such as the plasmid-based ligase chain-reaction and polymerase chain-reaction tests. However, the sensitivity and specificity estimates obtained by discrepant analysis are upwardly biased, and this bias remains even when a perfect test is used to resolve the discrepant results. This technique should not be adopted for evaluating the performance of a diagnostic test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8774575     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)05122-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  39 in total

1.  Discrepant analysis: how can we test a test?

Authors:  A J McAdam
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Methods and recommendations for evaluating and reporting a new diagnostic test.

Authors:  A S Hess; M Shardell; J K Johnson; K A Thom; P Strassle; G Netzer; A D Harris
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Quantitative PCR assay using sputum samples for rapid diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia in adult emergency department patients.

Authors:  Samuel Yang; Shin Lin; Ambreen Khalil; Charlotte Gaydos; Eric Nuemberger; George Juan; Justin Hardick; John G Bartlett; Paul G Auwaerter; Richard E Rothman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by enzyme immunoassay, culture, and three nucleic acid amplification tests.

Authors:  E Van Dyck; M Ieven; S Pattyn; L Van Damme; M Laga
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Utility of composite reference standards and latent class analysis in evaluating the clinical accuracy of diagnostic tests for pertussis.

Authors:  Andrew L Baughman; Kristine M Bisgard; Margaret M Cortese; William W Thompson; Gary N Sanden; Peter M Strebel
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2007-11-07

Review 6.  Diagnosis and assessment of trachoma.

Authors:  Anthony W Solomon; Rosanna W Peeling; Allen Foster; David C W Mabey
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Comparison of performances of two commercially available tests, a PCR assay and a ligase chain reaction test, in detection of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection.

Authors:  M Puolakkainen; E Hiltunen-Back; T Reunala; S Suhonen; P Lähteenmäki; M Lehtinen; J Paavonen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of multiplex PCR assay with culture for detection of genital mycoplasmas.

Authors:  Kathleen A Stellrecht; Amy M Woron; Nada G Mishrik; Richard A Venezia
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Performance of commercially available enzyme immunoassays for detection of antibodies against herpes simplex virus type 2 in African populations.

Authors:  Eddy van Dyck; Anne Buvé; Helen A Weiss; Judith R Glynn; David W G Brown; Bénédicte De Deken; John Parry; Richard J Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Performance of transcription-mediated amplification and ligase chain reaction assays for detection of chlamydial infection in urogenital samples obtained by invasive and noninvasive methods.

Authors:  A Stary; E Schuh; M Kerschbaumer; B Götz; H Lee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.