Literature DB >> 14551751

Positron flight in human tissues and its influence on PET image spatial resolution.

Alejandro Sánchez-Crespo1, Pedro Andreo, Stig A Larsson.   

Abstract

The influence of the positron distance of flight in various human tissues on the spatial resolution in positron emission tomography (PET) was assessed for positrons from carbon-11, nitrogen-13, oxygen-15, fluorine-18, gallium-68 and rubidium-82. The investigation was performed using the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE to simulate the transport of positrons within human compact bone, adipose, soft and lung tissue. The simulations yielded 3D distributions of annihilation origins that were projected on the image plane in order to assess their impact on PET spatial resolution. The distributions obtained were cusp-shaped with long tails rather than Gaussian shaped, thus making conventional full width at half maximum (FWHM) measures uncertain. The full width at 20% of the maximum amplitude (FW20M) of the annihilation distributions yielded more appropriate values for root mean square addition of spatial resolution loss components. Large differences in spatial resolution losses due to the positron flight in various human tissues were found for the selected radionuclides. The contribution to image blur was found to be up to three times larger in lung tissue than in soft tissue or fat and five times larger than in bone tissue. For (18)F, the spatial resolution losses were 0.54 mm in soft tissue and 1.52 mm in lung tissue, compared with 4.10 and 10.5 mm, respectively, for (82)Rb. With lung tissue as a possible exception, the image blur due to the positron flight in all human tissues has a minor impact as long as PET cameras with a spatial resolution of 5-7 mm are used in combination with (18)F-labelled radiopharmaceuticals. However, when ultra-high spatial resolution PET cameras, with 3-4 mm spatial resolution, are applied, especially in combination with other radionuclides, the positron flight may enter as a limiting factor for the total PET spatial resolution--particularly in lung tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14551751     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-003-1330-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  8 in total

1.  Performance evaluation of microPET: a high-resolution lutetium oxyorthosilicate PET scanner for animal imaging.

Authors:  A F Chatziioannou; S R Cherry; Y Shao; R W Silverman; K Meadors; T H Farquhar; M Pedarsani; M E Phelps
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Performance of a whole-body PET scanner using curve-plate NaI(Tl) detectors.

Authors:  L E Adam; J S Karp; M E Daube-Witherspoon; R J Smith
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Annihilation density distribution calculations for medically important positron emitters.

Authors:  M R Palmer; G L Brownell
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 4.  PET instrumentation: what are the limits?

Authors:  T F Budinger
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.446

5.  Performance evaluation of a whole-body PET scanner using the NEMA protocol. National Electrical Manufacturers Association.

Authors:  G Brix; J Zaers; L E Adam; M E Bellemann; H Ostertag; H Trojan; U Haberkorn; J Doll; F Oberdorfer; W J Lorenz
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Scintillation crystals for PET.

Authors:  C L Melcher
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Calculation of positron range and its effect on the fundamental limit of positron emission tomography system spatial resolution.

Authors:  C S Levin; E J Hoffman
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Positron ranges obtained from biomedically important positron-emitting radionuclides.

Authors:  Z H Cho; J K Chan; L Ericksson; M Singh; S Graham; N S MacDonald; Y Yano
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 10.057

  8 in total
  48 in total

1.  Amyloid-β imaging with PET in Alzheimer's disease: is it feasible with current radiotracers and technologies?

Authors:  Mateen C Moghbel; Babak Saboury; Sandip Basu; Scott D Metzler; Drew A Torigian; Bengt Långström; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Comparative assessment of energy-mapping approaches in CT-based attenuation correction for PET.

Authors:  Mohammad R Ay; Maryam Shirmohammad; Saeed Sarkar; Arman Rahmim; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 3.  Small animal PET: aspects of performance assessment.

Authors:  Simone Weber; Andreas Bauer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-10-02       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Issues in quantification of cardiac PET studies.

Authors:  Hugo W A M de Jong; Mark Lubberink
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Dose reduction in cone-beam CT scanning for intracranial stent deployment before coil embolization of intracranial wide-neck aneurysms.

Authors:  Takumi Kuriyama; Nobuyuki Sakai; Norimitsu Niida; Masaki Sueoka; Mikiya Beppu; Chihebeddine Dahmani; Iwao Kojima; Chiaki Sakai; Hirotoshi Imamura; Katsuhiro Masago; Nobuyuki Katakami
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 1.610

6.  ARRONAX, a high-energy and high-intensity cyclotron for nuclear medicine.

Authors:  Ferid Haddad; Ludovic Ferrer; Arnaud Guertin; Thomas Carlier; Nathalie Michel; Jacques Barbet; Jean-François Chatal
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  [(68)Ga]DOTATATE PET/MRI and [(18)F]FDG PET/CT are complementary and superior to diffusion-weighted MR imaging for radioactive-iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Alexis Vrachimis; Lars Stegger; Christian Wenning; Benjamin Noto; Matthias Christian Burg; Julia Renate Konnert; Thomas Allkemper; Walter Heindel; Burkhard Riemann; Michael Schäfers; Matthias Weckesser
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Effect of the positron range of 18F, 68Ga and 124I on PET/CT in lung-equivalent materials.

Authors:  Gerrit J Kemerink; Mariëlle G W Visser; Renee Franssen; Emiel Beijer; Mariangela Zamburlini; Servé G E A Halders; Boudewijn Brans; Felix M Mottaghy; Gerrit J J Teule
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Enhanced definition PET for cardiac imaging.

Authors:  Ludovic Le Meunier; Piotr J Slomka; Damini Dey; Amit Ramesh; Louis E J Thomson; Sean W Hayes; John D Friedman; Victor Cheng; Guido Germano; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 10.  Clinical applications of Gallium-68.

Authors:  Sangeeta Ray Banerjee; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 1.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.