Literature DB >> 10320109

Electrically evoked single-fiber action potentials from cat: responses to monopolar, monophasic stimulation.

C A Miller1, P J Abbas, B K Robinson, J T Rubinstein, A J Matsuoka.   

Abstract

We recorded action potentials from single auditory-nerve fibers of cats using monophasic current pulses delivered by a monopolar intracochlear electrode. These simple stimuli provided a means of investigating basic properties and hypotheses of electrical excitation. Standard micropipette recording techniques were used. Responses to anodic (positive) and cathodic (negative) stimulus pulses were recorded separately to evaluate stimulus polarity effects. Mean spike (action potential) latency was polarity dependent, with greater latencies for cathodic stimulation. Threshold stimulus level was also polarity dependent, with relatively lower cathodic thresholds. Both effects are consistent with trends reported in the compound action potential. Variability in single-fiber latency (i.e., jitter) was dependent upon stimulus polarity. In contrast, the slope of single-fiber input-output functions failed to show a clear polarity dependence, although such trends have been seen in the compound action potential data. We also observed a relatively greater degree of adaptation over time with anodic stimulation. Bimodal post-stimulus-time histograms were recorded in a small number (2%) of fibers, supporting the hypothesis that both the peripheral (dendritic) and central axonal processes are excitable with the same stimulus polarity, in a limited number of cases. This observation, together with analyses of interactions among measures of latency, threshold, and jitter, is consistent with the hypothesis that, with monopolar intracochlear stimulation, most fibers are stimulated at axonal (modiolar) sites and a minority of fibers nearest the electrode are stimulable at their peripheral processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10320109     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(99)00012-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  47 in total

1.  Renewal-process approximation of a stochastic threshold model for electrical neural stimulation.

Authors:  I C Bruce; L S Irlicht; M W White; S J O'Leary; G M Clark
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Desynchronization of electrically evoked auditory-nerve activity by high-frequency pulse trains of long duration.

Authors:  Leonid M Litvak; Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  A point process framework for modeling electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Jay T Rubinstein; Eric Shea-Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Changes in auditory nerve responses across the duration of sinusoidally amplitude-modulated electric pulse-train stimuli.

Authors:  Ning Hu; Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas; Barbara K Robinson; Jihwan Woo
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-15

5.  Neural masking by sub-threshold electric stimuli: animal and computer model results.

Authors:  Charles A Miller; Jihwan Woo; Paul J Abbas; Ning Hu; Barbara K Robinson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-16

6.  Encoding and decoding amplitude-modulated cochlear implant stimuli--a point process analysis.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Eric Shea-Brown; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 1.621

7.  Electrical excitation of the acoustically sensitive auditory nerve: single-fiber responses to electric pulse trains.

Authors:  Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas; Barbara K Robinson; Kirill V Nourski; Fawen Zhang; Fuh-Cherng Jeng
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-05-16

8.  A novel stimulus artifact removal technique for high-rate electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Leon F Heffer; James B Fallon
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2008-02-03       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Changes across time in spike rate and spike amplitude of auditory nerve fibers stimulated by electric pulse trains.

Authors:  Fawen Zhang; Charles A Miller; Barbara K Robinson; Paul J Abbas; Ning Hu
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-06-12

10.  Effects of high-rate pulse trains on electrode discrimination in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Christina L Runge-Samuelson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.