Literature DB >> 29785464

Contribution of Cochlear Compression to Discrimination of Rippled Spectra in On- and Low-frequency Noise.

Olga N Milekhina1, Dmitry I Nechaev1, Alexander Ya Supin2.   

Abstract

The goal of the study was to assess cochlear compression when rippled-spectrum signals are perceived in noise assuming that the noise might produce both masking and confounding effects. In normal listeners, discrimination between rippled signals with and without ripple phase reversals was assessed in background noise. The signals were band-limited (0.5 oct at a - 6-dB level) rippled noise centered at 2 kHz, with a ripple density of 3.5 oct-1. The noise (masker) was band-limited nonrippled noise centered at either 2 kHz (on-frequency masker) or 1 kHz (low-frequency masker). The masker was simultaneously presented with the signals. Masker levels at the discrimination threshold were measured as a function of the signal level using the adaptive (staircase) two-alternative forced-choice procedure. For the on-frequency masker, the searched-for function had a slope of 0.98 dB/dB. For the low-frequency masker, the function had a slope of 1.19 dB/dB within a signal level range of 30 to 40 dB sound pressure level (SPL) and as low as 0.15 dB/dB within a signal level range of 70 to 80 dB SPL. These results were interpreted as indicating compression of responses to both the signal and on-frequency masker and no compression of the effect of the low-frequency masker. In conditions when above-threshold signals are presented in simultaneous noise (the masker), cochlear compression manifests to a substantial degree despite possible confounding effects.

Keywords:  compression; hearing; masking; rippled noise

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29785464      PMCID: PMC6226409          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-018-0674-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  18 in total

1.  Ripple depth and density resolution of rippled noise.

Authors:  V V Popov; O N Milekhina; M B Tarakanov
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  Rippled-spectrum resolution dependence on level.

Authors:  Alexander Ya Supin; Vladimir V Popov; Olga N Milekhina; Mikhail B Tarakanov
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  The development of a modified spectral ripple test.

Authors:  Justin M Aronoff; David M Landsberger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Hearing sensitivity to shifts of rippled-spectrum patterns.

Authors:  Dmitry I Nechaev; Alexander Ya Supin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Psychophysical measures of auditory nonlinearities as a function of frequency in individuals with normal hearing.

Authors:  M L Hicks; S P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Ripple density resolution for various rippled-noise patterns.

Authors:  V V Popov; O N Milekhina; M B Tarakanov
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Basilar membrane nonlinearity determines auditory nerve rate-intensity functions and cochlear dynamic range.

Authors:  G K Yates; I M Winter; D Robertson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Basilar membrane mechanics at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. I. Input-output functions, tuning curves, and response phases.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero; N C Rich
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  A new procedure for measuring peripheral compression in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  D A Nelson; A C Schroder; M Wojtczak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.