Literature DB >> 16419827

Psychophysical estimates of nonlinear cochlear processing in younger and older listeners.

René H Gifford1, Sid P Bacon.   

Abstract

The primary goal of this project was to compare the performance of younger and older listeners on a number of psychophysical measures thought to be influenced by nonlinear cochlear processing. Younger (mean of 25.6 years) and older (mean of 63.8 years) listeners with normal hearing were matched (within 5 dB) according to their quiet thresholds at the two test frequencies of 1200 and 2400 Hz. They were similarly matched at the adjacent octave frequencies of 600 and 4800 Hz (within 5 dB at one and 9 dB at the other). Performance was compared on measures of auditory filter shape, psychophysical suppression, and growth of forward masking. There was no difference between the two age groups on these psychophysical estimates reflecting nonlinear processing, suggesting that aging per se does not affect the cochlear nonlinearity, at least for the ages sampled here. The results did, however, consistently demonstrate an age-related increase in the susceptibility to forward masking.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16419827      PMCID: PMC2441835          DOI: 10.1121/1.2126933

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  48 in total

1.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Speech identification difficulties of hearing-impaired elderly persons: the contributions of auditory processing deficits.

Authors:  L E Humes; L Christopherson
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1991-06

3.  Simplified measurement of auditory filter shapes using the notched-noise method.

Authors:  M A Stone; B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1992-12

4.  Frequency selectivity for hearing-impaired and broadband-noise-masked normal listeners.

Authors:  J R Dubno; A B Schaefer
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1991-08

5.  Auditory suppression and frequency selectivity in older and younger adults.

Authors:  M S Sommers; S E Gehr
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The shape of the ear's temporal window.

Authors:  B C Moore; B R Glasberg; C J Plack; A K Biswas
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Comparison of real and simulated hearing impairment in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear hearing loss.

Authors:  B C Moore; D A Vickers; B R Glasberg; T Baer
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1997-08

8.  Stimulus parameters governing confusion effects in forward masking.

Authors:  D L Neff
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Auditory filter shapes in normal-hearing, noise-masked normal, and elderly listeners.

Authors:  M S Sommers; L E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Auditory filter shapes at low center frequencies in young and elderly hearing-impaired subjects.

Authors:  R W Peters; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  9 in total

1.  Individual differences in behavioral estimates of cochlear nonlinearities.

Authors:  Gayla L Poling; Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-09-22

2.  Effects of background noise level on behavioral estimates of basilar-membrane compression.

Authors:  Melanie J Gregan; Peggy B Nelson; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  An examination of speech recognition in a modulated background and of forward masking in younger and older listeners.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Sid P Bacon; Erica J Williams
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Temporal masking functions for listeners with real and simulated hearing loss.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The effects of preceding sound and stimulus duration on measures of suppression in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Erica L Hegland; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Age-related differences in the temporal modulation transfer function with pure-tone carriers.

Authors:  Ning-ji He; John H Mills; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Masking Period Patterns and Forward Masking for Speech-Shaped Noise: Age-Related Effects.

Authors:  John H Grose; Denise C Menezes; Heather L Porter; Silvana Griz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Age-group differences in speech identification despite matched audiometrically normal hearing: contributions from auditory temporal processing and cognition.

Authors:  Christian Füllgrabe; Brian C J Moore; Michael A Stone
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 5.750

9.  Aging and Spectro-Temporal Integration of Speech.

Authors:  John H Grose; Heather L Porter; Emily Buss
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 3.293

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.