Literature DB >> 9555632

Genetic links, family ties, and social bonds: rights and responsibilities in the face of genetic knowledge.

R Rhodes1.   

Abstract

Currently, some of the most significant moral issues involving genetic links relate to genetic knowledge. In this paper, instead of looking at the frequently addressed issues of responsibilities professionals or institutions have to individuals, I take up the question of what responsibilities individuals have to one another with respect to genetic knowledge. I address the questions of whether individuals have a moral right to pursue their own goals without contributing to society's knowledge of population genetics, without adding to their family's knowledge of its genetic history, and without discovering genetic information about themselves and their offspring. These questions lead to an examination of the presumed right to genetic ignorance and an exploration of a variety of social bonds. Analyzing cases in light of these considerations leads to a surprising conclusion about a widely accepted precept of genetic counseling, to some ethical insights into typical problems, and to some further unanswered questions about personal responsibility in the face of genetic knowledge.

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9555632     DOI: 10.1076/jmep.23.1.10.2594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Philos        ISSN: 0360-5310


  29 in total

1.  Genetic ignorance and reasonable paternalism.

Authors:  T Takala
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2001-09

Review 2.  Genetic information, rights, and autonomy.

Authors:  M Häyry; T Takala
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2001-09

3.  Genetic privacy: orthodoxy or oxymoron?

Authors:  A Sommerville; V English
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Can Broad Consent be Informed Consent?

Authors:  Mark Sheehan
Journal:  Public Health Ethics       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 1.940

5.  Firing up the nature/nurture controversy: bioethics and genetic determinism.

Authors:  I de Melo-Martín
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 6.  Concepts of "person" and "liberty," and their implications to our fading notions of autonomy.

Authors:  Tuija Takala
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  Questioning the consensus: managing carrier status results generated by newborn screening.

Authors:  Fiona Alice Miller; Jason Scott Robert; Robin Z Hayeems
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 8.  Just ignore it? Parents and genetic information.

Authors:  S Vehmas
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2001-09

Review 9.  Antenatal genetic testing and the right to remain in ignorance.

Authors:  R Bennett
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2001-09

10.  Genetic testing of children for familial cancers: a comparative legal perspective on consent, communication of information and confidentiality.

Authors:  Roy Gilbar
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.