| Literature DB >> 19059852 |
Fiona Alice Miller1, Jason Scott Robert, Robin Z Hayeems.
Abstract
An apparent consensus governs the management of carrier status information generated incidentally through newborn screening: results cannot be withheld from parents. This normative stance encodes the focus on autonomy and distaste for paternalism that characterize the principles of clinical bioethics. However, newborn screening is a classic public health intervention in which paternalism may trump autonomy and through which parents are-in effect-required to receive carrier information. In truth, the disposition of carrier results generates competing moral infringements: to withhold information or require its possession. Resolving this dilemma demands consideration of a distinctive body of public health ethics to highlight the moral imperatives associated with the exercise of collective authority in the pursuit of public health benefits.Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 19059852 PMCID: PMC2622768 DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.136614
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Public Health ISSN: 0090-0036 Impact factor: 9.308