Literature DB >> 22102849

Can Broad Consent be Informed Consent?

Mark Sheehan1.   

Abstract

In biobanks, a broader model of consent is often used and justified by a range of different strategies that make reference to the potential benefits brought by the research it will facilitate combined with the low level of risk involved (provided adequate measures are in place to protect privacy and confidentiality) or a questioning of the centrality of the notion of informed consent. Against this, it has been suggested that the lack of specific information about particular uses of the samples means that such consent cannot be fully autonomous and so is unethical. My answer to the title question is a definite 'yes'. Broad consent can be informed consent and is justified by appeal to the principle of respect for autonomy. Indeed, I will suggest that the distinction between the various kinds of consent is not a distinction between kinds of consent but between the kinds of choice a person makes. When an individual makes a choice (of any kind) it is important that they do so according to the standards of informed consent and consistent with the choice that they are making.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22102849      PMCID: PMC3218673          DOI: 10.1093/phe/phr020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Ethics        ISSN: 1754-9973            Impact factor:   1.940


  20 in total

Review 1.  The social and ethical issues of post-genomic human biobanks.

Authors:  Anne Cambon-Thomsen
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Potential harms, anonymization, and the right to withdraw consent to biobank research.

Authors:  Stefan Eriksson; Gert Helgesson
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 3.  Expanding the ethical analysis of biobanks.

Authors:  Mark A Rothstein
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.718

4.  To know or not to know? Genetic ignorance, autonomy and paternalism.

Authors:  Jane Wilson
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.898

5.  Consent revisited: points to consider.

Authors:  Bartha Maria Knoppers
Journal:  Health Law Rev       Date:  2005

6.  Genetic links, family ties, and social bonds: rights and responsibilities in the face of genetic knowledge.

Authors:  R Rhodes
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  1998-02

7.  Reconsidering the value of consent in biobank research.

Authors:  Judy Allen; Beverley McNamara
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.898

8.  Autonomy and negatively informed consent.

Authors:  U Kihlbom
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 9.  Tumour banks: well-guarded treasures in the interest of patients.

Authors:  J Wolter Oosterhuis; Jan Willem Coebergh; Evert-Ben van Veen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 10.  Ignorance, information and autonomy.

Authors:  J Harris; K Keywood
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2001-09
View more
  52 in total

1.  Broad consent and biorepositories for molecular epidemiology and genomics research.

Authors:  Steven S Coughlin
Journal:  Int J Mol Epidemiol Genet       Date:  2011-11-25

2.  Consent to epistemic interventions: a contribution to the debate on the right (not) to know.

Authors:  Niels Nijsingh
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2016-03

3.  Enabling Posthumous Medical Data Donation: An Appeal for the Ethical Utilisation of Personal Health Data.

Authors:  Jenny Krutzinna; Mariarosaria Taddeo; Luciano Floridi
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Where should we draw the line between quality of care and other ethical concerns related to medical registries and biobanks?

Authors:  Mats Hansson
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2012-08

5.  Can dynamic consent facilitate the protection of biomedical big data in biobanking in Malaysia?

Authors:  Mohammad Firdaus Abdul Aziz; Aimi Nadia Mohd Yusof
Journal:  Asian Bioeth Rev       Date:  2019-05-25

6.  Biobanking: The Melding of Research with Clinical Care.

Authors:  Maureen E Smith; Sharon Aufox
Journal:  Curr Genet Med Rep       Date:  2013-06

Review 7.  Stakeholders' perspectives on biobank-based genomic research: systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Alma Husedzinovic; Dominik Ose; Christoph Schickhardt; Stefan Fröhling; Eva C Winkler
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Participant views on consent in cancer genetics research: preparing for the precision medicine era.

Authors:  Karen L Edwards; Diane M Korngiebel; Lesley Pfeifer; Deborah Goodman; Anne Renz; Lari Wenzel; Deborah J Bowen; Celeste M Condit
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2016-01-22

9.  Addressing Benefits, Risks and Consent in Next Generation Sequencing Studies.

Authors:  R Meller
Journal:  J Clin Res Bioeth       Date:  2015-12-14

10.  Broad consent in practice: lessons learned from a hospital-based biobank for prospective research on genomic and medical data.

Authors:  Gaia Barazzetti; Francesca Bosisio; Daria Koutaissoff; Brenda Spencer
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 4.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.