Literature DB >> 11808681

Just ignore it? Parents and genetic information.

S Vehmas1.   

Abstract

This paper discusses whether prospective parents ought to find out about their genetic constitution for reproductive reasons. It is argued that ignoring genetic information can be in line with responsible parenthood or perhaps even recommendable. This is because parenthood is essentially an unconditional project in which parents ought to commit themselves to nurturing any kind of child. Besides, the traditional reasons offered for the unfortunateness of impairments and the tragic fate of families with disabled children are not convincing. Other morally problematic outcomes of genetics, such as discrimination against individuals with impairments, and limiting free parental decision making, are also considered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11808681     DOI: 10.1023/a:1013067003439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth        ISSN: 1386-7415


  11 in total

1.  Abortion and assent.

Authors:  R Rhodes
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  The disability rights critique of prenatal genetic testing. Reflections and Recommendations.

Authors:  E Parens; A Asch
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.683

3.  Genetic ignorance, moral obligations and social duties.

Authors:  T Takala; M Häyry
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2000-02

4.  Choices and rights: eugenics, genetics and disability equality.

Authors:  Tom Shakespeare
Journal:  Disabil Soc       Date:  1998-11

5.  On being genetically "irresponsible".

Authors:  Judith Andre; Leonard M Fleck; Tom Tomlinson
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  2000-06

Review 6.  Genetic dilemmas and the child's right to an open future.

Authors:  D S Davis
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.683

7.  Response to "abortion and assent" by Rosamond Rhodes (CQ Vol 8, No 4) and "abortion, disability, assent, and consent" by Matti Häyry (CQ Vol 10, No 1). Assent and selective abortion: a response to Rhodes and Häyry.

Authors:  S Vehmas
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Genetic links, family ties, and social bonds: rights and responsibilities in the face of genetic knowledge.

Authors:  R Rhodes
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  1998-02

9.  What kinds of people should we create?

Authors:  J Hudson
Journal:  J Appl Philos       Date:  2000

10.  Is it wrong to deliberately conceive or give birth to a child with mental retardation?

Authors:  Simo Vehmas
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2002-02
View more
  5 in total

1.  Genetic ignorance and reasonable paternalism.

Authors:  T Takala
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2001-09

Review 2.  Genetic information, rights, and autonomy.

Authors:  M Häyry; T Takala
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2001-09

3.  Communicating genetic information in the family: enriching the debate through the notion of integrity.

Authors:  Paula Boddington; Maggie Gregory
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2008-04-09

4.  Harms to "Others" and the Selection Against Disability View.

Authors:  Nicola Jane Williams
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2017-04-01

5.  The right not to know and the obligation to know.

Authors:  Ben Davies
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 5.926

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.