Literature DB >> 9519705

The perception of face gender: the role of stimulus structure in recognition and classification.

A J O'Toole1, K A Deffenbacher, D Valentin, K McKee, D Huff, H Abdi.   

Abstract

The perception of face gender was examined in the context of extending "face space" models of human face representations to include the perceptual categories defined by male and female faces. We collected data on the recognizability, gender classifiability (reaction time to classify a face as male/female), attractiveness, and masculinity/femininity of individual male and female faces. Factor analyses applied separately to the data for male and female faces yielded the following results. First, for both male and female faces, the recognizability and gender classifiability of faces were independent--a result inconsistent with the hypothesis that both recognizability and gender classifiability depend on a face's "distance" from the subcategory gender prototype. Instead, caricatured aspects of gender (femininity/masculinity ratings) related to the gender classifiability of the faces. Second, facial attractiveness related inversely to face recognizability for male, but not for female, faces--a result that resolves inconsistencies in previous studies. Third, attractiveness and femininity for female faces were nearly equivalent, but attractiveness and masculinity for male faces were not equivalent. Finally, we applied principal component analysis to the pixel-coded face images with the aim of extracting measures related to the gender classifiability and recognizability of individual faces. We incorporated these model-derived measures into the factor analysis with the human rating and performance measures. This combined analysis indicated that face recognizability is related to the distinctiveness of a face with respect to its gender subcategory prototype. Additionally, the gender classifiability of faces related to at least one caricatured aspect of face gender.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9519705     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  26 in total

1.  Familiarity, memorability, and the effect of typicality on the recognition of faces.

Authors:  J R Vokey; J D Read
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-05

2.  You can tell by the nose--judging sex from an isolated facial feature.

Authors:  E P Chronicle; M Y Chan; C Hawkings; K Mason; K Smethurst; K Stallybrass; K Westrope; K Wright
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; J Corwin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-03

4.  Sex classification is better with three-dimensional head structure than with image intensity information.

Authors:  A J O'Toole; T Vetter; N F Troje; H H Bülthoff
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Looking at faces: first-order and second-order features as determinants of facial appearance.

Authors:  G Rhodes
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  A perceptron reveals the face of sex.

Authors:  M S Gray; D T Lawrence; B A Golomb; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.026

7.  What gives a face its gender?

Authors:  E Brown; D I Perrett
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 8.  CONSPEC and CONLERN: a two-process theory of infant face recognition.

Authors:  J Morton; M H Johnson
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  What's the difference between men and women? Evidence from facial measurement.

Authors:  A M Burton; V Bruce; N Dench
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Understanding face recognition.

Authors:  V Bruce; A Young
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1986-08
View more
  25 in total

1.  The development of facial gender categorization in individuals with and without autism: the impact of typicality.

Authors:  Mark S Strauss; Lisa C Newell; Catherine A Best; Sarah F Hannigen; Holly Zajac Gastgeb; Joyce L Giovannelli
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2012-09

2.  The role of facial attractiveness and facial masculinity/femininity in sex classification of faces.

Authors:  Rebecca A Hoss; Jennifer L Ramsey; Angela M Griffin; Judith H Langlois
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Compatibility of basic social perceptions determines perceived attractiveness.

Authors:  Kerri L Johnson; Louis G Tassinary
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Can individuals with autism abstract prototypes of natural faces?

Authors:  Holly Zajac Gastgeb; Desirée A Wilkinson; Nancy J Minshew; Mark S Strauss
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2011-12

5.  Gender discrimination of eyes and mouths by individuals with autism.

Authors:  Catherine A Best; Nancy J Minshew; Mark S Strauss
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.216

6.  Categorization in ASD: The Role of Typicality and Development.

Authors:  Holly Zajac Gastgeb; Mark S Strauss
Journal:  Perspect Lang Learn Educ       Date:  2012-03-01

7.  Bayesian face recognition and perceptual narrowing in face-space.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2012-07

8.  The Relative Importance of Sexual Dimorphism, Fluctuating Asymmetry, and Color Cues to Health during Evaluation of Potential Partners' Facial Photographs : A Conjoint Analysis Study.

Authors:  Justin K Mogilski; Lisa L M Welling
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2017-03

9.  Social Vision: Functional Forecasting and the Integration of Compound Social Cues.

Authors:  Reginald B Adams; Kestutis Kveraga
Journal:  Rev Philos Psychol       Date:  2015-05-07

10.  Individual Aesthetic Preferences for Faces Are Shaped Mostly by Environments, Not Genes.

Authors:  Laura Germine; Richard Russell; P Matthew Bronstad; Gabriëlla A M Blokland; Jordan W Smoller; Holum Kwok; Samuel E Anthony; Ken Nakayama; Gillian Rhodes; Jeremy B Wilmer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.